Posts Tagged ‘God’


For several weeks, more specifically, since November 5, 2024, I have been resonating with a profound phrase in my spirit: “Gideon’s remnant army is arising!”

This declaration evokes the Biblical tale of Gideon, found in Judges 7, where the Israelites, hardened by their own transgressions, find themselves oppressed by the Midianites. After seven years of tyranny, they are reduced to hiding in the mountains and caves, stripped of their strength and dignity.

In this dire situation, God calls upon Gideon to rally an army, but the Lord, in His divine wisdom, reduces Gideon’s forces from 32,000 warriors to a mere 300. This seemingly small number against the vast Midianite army symbolizes a powerful truth: God’s strength is made perfect in our weakness.

God’s intention in this narrative was not solely to confront the Midianites but also to challenge the Israelites’ idolatry and reliance on false gods. The Israelites had turned away from the very foundation of their strength—faith in God.

As we reflect on the current state of our nation, it is impossible to ignore the parallels. A country that once proclaimed, “In God We Trust” now grapples with moral confusion, celebrating darkness as light and heralding evil as good.

The flag that once signified freedom and divine dependence is increasingly overshadowed by symbols that represent depravity and disorientation. In this context, the remnant—those who remain steadfast in faith amidst chaos—becomes a beacon of hope.

Returning to Gideon’s narrative, the Lord equips him and his 300 men with unconventional weapons: clay pots, torches, and ram’s horns. These instruments of warfare defy human logic and convention.

Yet, God instructs Gideon to act in unison with his men, demonstrating the power of unity and obedience to divine command. When they break the clay pots and reveal the blazing torches, they signal not only their presence but also the manifestation of God’s power in the midst of overwhelming odds.

The Midianites, caught in confusion and panic, turn on one another, resulting in a victory that no human strength could claim. This ancient story serves as a prophetic reminder for the church today.

The body of Christ finds itself facing an expansive “enemy army” that appears insurmountable. The mainstream media, which I humorously refer to as “Mediaites,” has become a formidable force, spreading misinformation and fostering division among the people.

Yet, even in this bleak landscape, there remains a remnant—those who refuse to bow to the pressures of the world and continue to wield the light of truth against the shadows of deceit.

The assurance from 2 Kings 6:16 resounds with clarity: “Don’t be afraid… Those who are with us are more than those who are with them.” The battle may seem daunting, but the heavenly hosts stand firm alongside the remnant.

We are called to carry the blazing torch of truth and declare the victory of Yahweh with the sound of our voices. The time is approaching when the clay jars will shatter, and the light will shine forth, illuminating the darkness and instilling fear in the hearts of the oppressors.

As we navigate the societal unrest and chaos that characterize our current era, it is crucial to recognize that the conflict extends beyond physical manifestations.

It is a spiritual battle—a Civil War of ideologies, morals, and truths. The remnant army, empowered by faith, will rise up, uniting their voices to strike fear into the hearts of the wicked.

The message is clear: tyranny will not triumph, and the oppressors will not prevail. Gideon’s army, a testament of faith and divine intervention, will once again emerge victorious. In conclusion, the tale of Gideon’s remnant army is not merely a historical account; it is a prophetic call to action for believers today.

We are reminded that it is not by human might or power that we achieve victory, but by the Spirit of the Lord. As we embrace our roles as warriors in this spiritual battle, let us remain steadfast, united, and resolute in carrying the light of truth into the darkness.

The remnant is rising, and with it, the promise of victory in the face of overwhelming odds.

~Dr. Russell Welch
Elder / Apostolic Teacher: Highway to Heaven Church and Founder and Shepherd of Remnant Warrior Ministries / Remnant Warrior School of Spiritual Warfare.


In an age characterized by moral ambiguity and spiritual dilution, the concept of a “remnant” holds profound significance for believers.

Defined as “that which remains” or “a distinct part of a larger whole,” the term captures the essence of a devoted group within the Christian faith that remains steadfast in their commitment to God.

New Testament verses which refer to a faithful “remnant” ([Biblical Greek]: λεῖμμα, romanized: leîmma) include [Romans 11:5], where Paulr efers back to Old Testament examples, and [Revelation 12:17] (“And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ”)

This passage in scripture (Revelations 12:17) is not referring to the lack luster Christian, who goes to Church on Sunday and lives like a heathen the rest of the week. Those who sit year after year under a leadership that is made up by those who feed off of a compromised religious system. Such congregations are likened to the Laodicean Church in scripture.

The Laodicean Church was a Christian community in the ancient city of Laodicea, which is now located in Turkey. It was established during the beginning of the New Testament Church, the earliest period of Christianity.

What is the Laodicean Church known for?

It’s one of the Seven churches of Asia addressed by name in the Book of Revelation

It’s the only church in the group that receives no praise from Jesus, only rebuke

The church was spiritually blind and complacent

What does the Bible say about the Laodicean Church?

The church is mentioned in Colossians 2:1, Colossians 4:13-16, Revelation 1:11, and Revelation 3:14-22

Jesus’ message to the church is found in Revelation 3:14-22

Jesus condemns the church for being neither cold nor hot

Jesus counsels the church to repent and apply a spiritual eye-salve

So, as a true student of the Holy Word of the Lord, we must study from the seat of viewing the scriptures in proper context. And with regard to Revelation 12:17, we can clearly see that this passage comes on the heels of Revelation 12:11.

Which giving what is written in verse 17, is a direct reference to the Remnant of the Lord “And they overcame him by the blood of the Lamb and by the word of their testimony, for they loved not their lives even unto death”.

As we navigate these last days, there emerges a compelling belief that God is actively calling forth a Holy Remnant Church (Ecclesia)—an assembly of individuals dedicated to living out the teachings of Jesus Christ with fervor and purity.

This remnant is not merely a fraction of the church; it represents the core of the True Church, the Body and Bride of Christ, standing in stark contrast to the apostate congregations that pervade our contemporary religious landscape.

The phenomenon of individuals leaving traditional organized churches to pursue a deeper relationship with God is both striking and significant. As people seek authenticity in their faith, many find themselves drawn to a community that prioritizes simplicity in worship, doctrinal purity, and a profound understanding of Scripture.

This shift is often misinterpreted by establishment Christianity, yet it signifies a divine calling to embrace a life that is wholly dedicated to Christ. The Remnant Church is emerging as a response to societal distractions, materialism, and the convoluted ideologies that have infiltrated mainstream religious institutions.

In what is perceived as a time of testing, this remnant is being prepared to “stand” for truth and to fulfill the Great Commission and Great Commandment in a world that desperately needs hope.

At the heart of the Remnant Church lies an unwavering commitment to the Word of God. Its members are individuals who recognize their identity as sons and daughters of God, guided by the Holy Spirit in their quest for deeper intimacy with Christ.

As they diligently study the Scriptures, they embody the characteristics of the Bereans, who were commended for their eagerness to receive and examine the Word.

This hunger for God’s truth fosters a community that operates not in self-importance but in humility, understanding that their purpose is to reflect the love and power of God in their lives.

The Remnant Church does not seek glory for itself but desires to magnify the greatness of God. Moreover, the Remnant Church stands firmly against the encroachment of pagan ideologies and humanistic beliefs that have tainted many contemporary congregations.

It is a community that prioritizes the teachings of Jesus and the doctrines of the early Church, ensuring that their faith remains unadulterated. This commitment to biblical truth is not without its challenges. As history has shown, those who adhere to the pure Gospel often face persecution.

The apostle Paul warned of such trials—both to Timothy and the Philippians—reminding believers that living godly in Christ Jesus will inevitably attract opposition.

Yet, the Remnant Church is undeterred, fully embracing the reality that sacrifice and suffering are part of their calling. In conclusion, as we find ourselves in a world rife with confusion and moral decay, the call to be part of the Remnant Church resonates more than ever.

This is a call to emulate the early Church of Acts—a community marked by faith, sacrifice, and a willingness to turn the world upside down for the sake of the Gospel.

The Remnant Church is not simply a group; it is a movement of individuals who are collectively committed to honoring God amidst adversities, proclaiming the truth of Scripture, and serving as a beacon of hope in a desperate world.

As believers, we are invited to respond to this divine invitation, embracing our role in the Remnant Church and standing firm in our faith until the very end.

If this message speaks to you, and you have a inner longing to be part of such a Kingdom family, seek direction from Holy Spirit. For I believe that Heaven has strategical been raising up such Remnant Congregations throughout the nation, many which are regional, with some states having multiple congregation connected to each other, with all five gifts in operation.

But be aware, if you find comfort in the tradition setting of “Church”, you may not find that within these congregations, and very rarely do you find such within the context of either the “Mega-Church” setting nor the rising popularity of the Franchised Church model led by a celebrity charismatic pastor.

In fact I have found that many of these Congregations are small in size, anywhere from a handful to a few hundred members, functioning under the religious radar of popularity.

However, these Kingdom families are well known within the demonic realm for the authority and power of Christ that they wield. In truth, none of these Congregation desire to be in the lime light, for they burn with a passionate fire seeking but to bring attention to their King Jesus, His Kingdom and His Righteousness.

~Dr. Russell Welch Elder / Apostolic Teacher: Highway to Heaven Church and Founder and Shepherd of Remnant Warrior Ministries / Remnant Warrior School of Spiritual Warfare.


The Christian life, as practiced in many American churches rooted in Western theology, often reflects a commitment to certain principles of truth. This life, while earnest and sincere, is frequently characterized by a conformity to doctrines and interpretations that may not fully encapsulate the essence of living in Christ.

In contrast, the authentic ecclesia—those truly embodying the teachings of Christ—embraces a Christ-centric lifestyle, one that is animated by the Holy Spirit and deeply rooted in a direct relationship with Jesus.

At its core, the average Christian life typically involves an earnest effort to emulate Christ. Believers strive to align their actions with the Church’s interpretations of His teachings, attempting to live according to established principles.

While this commitment is commendable, it often leads to a performance-driven mindset that can create feelings of inadequacy or frustration. The challenge lies in the distinction between imitation and incarnation; the former is a conscious effort to replicate Christ’s actions, while the latter acknowledges the transformative power of Christ’s life living within the believer.

“The first more often than not seeks to imitate their pastor, where as the latter is totally surrendered to the Lord life being exampled in their lives”

The true essence of the Christian experience transcends mere imitation. It is about allowing Christ’s own life to take residence in one’s heart, leading to a profound transformation that cannot be achieved through human strength alone.

This divine life, fueled by Holy Spirit, empowers believers to overcome obstacles and challenges that, in their own power, they could not conquer. It invites them into a relational dynamic with Jesus, where His strength becomes their strength, and His victory becomes their victory.

For many, this may be a new and perhaps startling thought. The idea that the life of Christ can be realized within each believer is revolutionary, although not a new revelation. It shifts the focus from striving for moral perfection to embracing the grace that comes from a genuine relationship with Christ.

This notion stands as one of the most profound truths in the cosmos, offering a sense of hope and liberation to those who are weary from the burdens of religious obligation. In summary, while many American churches foster a sincere commitment to Christian principles, there is a deeper reality available to believers—a Christ-centered existence that is not merely about effort but about surrendering to the life of Christ within.

Some may find this perspective to be a novel thought, perhaps even challenging the traditional notions of what it means to live a Christian life. However, I can personally attest to the truth and power of this “Best Thought” in all of the cosmos.

It is a liberating revelation that offers hope and encouragement to those weary from the burdens of religious performance. Embracing a Christ-centric lifestyle enables us to experience a deeper intimacy with God, a profound joy in our daily walk, and the empowerment to face life’s difficulties with resilience

The essence of authentic Christianity: a living, dynamic relationship with Jesus, activated by the Holy Spirit, that empowers believers to live victoriously in a way that their own strength cannot achieve.

As we cultivate this relationship, we not only experience personal renewal but also become conduits of grace and hope in a world desperately in need of the authentic message of the Gospel. Let us pursue this deeper relationship, allowing Christ’s life to shine through us in all its glory.

~Dr. Russell Welch
Elder / Apostolic Teacher: Highway to Heaven Church and Founder and Shepherd of Remnant Warrior Ministries / Remnant Warrior School of Spiritual Warfare.

For a deeper understanding of this type of life style, we highly recommend that you read Dr. Welch’s book “Spirit Wind People: Those Who are Moved by the Impulses of Holy Spirit” which can be viewed and purchased on Amazon by clicking here


In a world overflowing with distractions and spiritual turmoil, the concept of spiritual warfare often feels daunting and distant for many. While we may not be engaged in epic battles of national importance, the reality remains that we are all fighting personal spiritual battles that require attention and strategy. Central to these struggles is the practice of fasting—a powerful yet often overlooked tool that can elevate our spiritual walk and bring us closer to God.

As believers, we can draw strength from the same weapons that great men of God utilized throughout the Bible, highlighting the importance of humbling ourselves before God and engaging in a lifestyle of fasting.

Fasting is not merely a ritual; it is an intentional act of surrendering to God. It is an acknowledgment of our vulnerabilities and a conscious effort to draw nearer to the divine. In my own life, I experienced the liberating power of fasting when I found myself ensnared by the chains of sin, including sexual sins.

Through humbling myself before God in fasting, I found that it was not my sacrifices that moved Him, but rather my willingness to step into His spiritual realm. God’s grace enveloped me, leading me toward freedom.

This personal testimony underscores the transformative power of fasting and its essential role in our spiritual journeys. Over the years I have joined in with other ministries and the communities that I was part of who adopted fasting as a fundamental practice.

For example, each January, for a number of years I joined in with Jentezen Franklin’s Church committing to 21 days of fasting, and other times I would fast the first three days of each month. This commitment stems from my understanding of the spiritual warfare we face and the Lord’s Chosen one’s—the calling to fulfill, calamities to overcome, and spiritual enemies to conquer.

Regular fasting not only strengthens our connection to God but equips us to face adversities with renewed faith and resilience. Recognizing that spiritual conflict is an ever-present reality compels us to adopt fasting as a regular habit.

As articulated in John 10:10, the spiritual adversary seeks to “steal, kill, or destroy” our God-given joy. By fasting and praying, we harness vital weapons to claim victories over these forces. Instead of merely addressing the symptoms of our struggles, we must dig deeper to confront the root causes of our spiritual issues.

This proactive approach allows us to engage with the unseen spiritual world that pervades our lives, thereby making prayer an indispensable part of our spiritual arsenal. It is essential to acknowledge that some within the Church argue that fasting is unnecessary under the New Covenant—an argument that seems to contradict the teachings of Jesus.

In Matthew 9:15, Jesus states, “Can the wedding guests mourn while the bridegroom is still with them? The days will come when the bridegroom is taken away from them, and then they will fast.” This statement reinforces the continued relevance and necessity of fasting in our spiritual lives.

As Spiritual Warriors for the Lord, we are called to uphold the orthodoxy of Scripture and embrace the practices that deepen our relationship with God. As we embark on a new year, I encourage you to seek God earnestly through prayer and fasting.

By doing so, you open yourself to the profound possibilities of divine intervention. Fasting is not a mere act of deprivation; it is a pathway to spiritual awakening and renewal. May you experience the power of fasting and witness the transformative answers to your prayers as you navigate the spiritual battles that lie ahead.

My prayer is that you, reader, will embrace this sacred practice, and allow God to lead you into a deeper, more victorious relationship with Him.

~Dr. Russell Welch
Elder / Apostolic Teacher: Highway to Heaven Church and Founder and Shepherd of Remnant Warrior Ministries / Remnant Warrior School of Spiritual Warfare.

Be sure to check out Dr. Welch’s newest book “Dare to Sin No More – Breaking free from Sin’s Grasp“”


The recent arrest of a suspect in the murder of a prominent CEO has sparked a disturbing trend in society: the idolization of individuals who commit heinous acts. This phenomenon is not just a reflection of public fascination with crime but is also deeply rooted in the influence of various societal gates: Arts & Entertainment, Media, Education, and Government.

Each of these spiritual spheres contributes to shaping public perception, often glorifying the wrong ideals while undermining the pillars of integrity and morality. Starting with the Gate of Arts & Entertainment, we witness a culture that has increasingly romanticized anti-heroes and corporate villains over the past few decades.

Hollywood has produced countless films and television shows that depict corporations as malevolent entities, thereby creating a narrative that often vilifies successful businesses while inadvertently glorifying those who oppose them, sometimes through violent means.

This portrayal fosters a toxic environment where individuals begin to idolize those who rebel against the system, regardless of the consequences of their actions. Then when certain news originations A.K.A, the Media chooses to sensationalize crimes rather than examine the underlying issues, it creates a distorted reality where the perpetrator is viewed as a misunderstood figure rather than a villain.

The influence of the Gate of Education cannot be overlooked, particularly as elite institutions often cultivate an environment of disdain towards successful corporations. The Ivy League and other prestigious universities sometimes promote a framework that criticizes the free market and capitalism without fully acknowledging the benefits these entities bring to society.

This academic bias can lead to a generation that is misinformed about the complexities of corporate structure and the essential role that these companies play in driving economic growth and innovation. By failing to teach students about the financial prosperity generated by hard work and entrepreneurship, educational institutions inadvertently provide fertile ground for resentment and misunderstanding.

Perhaps most concerning is the role of the Government, which has historically regulated industries in a manner that might seem to support the very grievances they later vocalize, using media sources like a mouth piece.

The insurance industry, for example, has seen its growth largely as a result of regulations put in place by lawmakers. Ironically, as these regulations create financial gains for corporations, they also provide politicians with a scapegoat, allowing them to divert attention from their own failings and agendas.

This blame-shifting reinforces a narrative that demonizes successful businesses while absolving those in power from accountability. One cannot help but wonder how much of this societal decay could be mitigated if the Church stood firm in its rightful place, actively engaging and reigning over these gates of influence.

Unfortunately, for the past few decades the compromised state of the Church has allowed for a vacuum in moral leadership. Instead of providing guidance rooted in spiritual truth, many have sought worldly answers, further fueling the cycle of perversion within these influential realms. One can not feed off from the systems of this world without become infected by its ideologies and philosophies.

It is imperative for the Church to reclaim its position, offering a counter-narrative that celebrates ethical business practices, the value of human life, and the importance of integrity. The winds of change are upon us, and now is the time for the Church to repent and reposition itself as a guiding force within society.

By doing so, it can take possession of the Gates of Influence, ensuring that the values of compassion, justice, and righteousness permeate every aspect of life in this nation. Only then can we hope to see a society that prioritizes goodness, reflecting the values of the Lord God, and paving the way for a brighter future—one that holds individuals accountable for their actions and recognizes the true nature of success.

The idolization of the vile must end, and it is the responsibility of all, especially the Church, to lead the charge toward a more virtuous society. We, as the Body of Christ, must act now while the window of opportunity is open before us. Holy Spirit is leading the charge, have releases a spiritual wind that is re-setting things in this hour.

For more insight on how to begin to establish the things of the Kingdom, here and now, I encourage you to order this course as it will reveal many spiritual tactic, as we engage in this spiritual war for the soul of the Church and the nation: “Cultivating the Kingdom: A Blue Print for Transforming today’s Culture Through Christ’s Ecclesia“.

~Dr. Russell Welch
Elder / Apostolic Teacher: Highway to Heaven Church and Founder and Shepherd of Remnant Warrior Ministries / Remnant Warrior School of Spiritual Warfare.

Check out Dr. Welch’s new book: Dare to Sin No More: Breaking Free from Sin’s Grasp


In an era defined by rapid technological advancements and interconnectedness, the specter of manipulation looms larger than ever.

The statement “The enemy find no greater pleasure than hijacking the destinies of individuals and whole organizations, even through familiar faces” encapsulates a profound truth about the vulnerabilities that exist in our personal and professional lives.

This post will explore the intricate dynamics of manipulation, the role of familiar faces in this process, and the ramifications of allowing external forces to dictate our paths.

At the core of manipulation lies the ability to exploit trust and familiarity. When individuals encounter someone they know—be it a friend, colleague, or family member—they are often predisposed to lower their defenses.

This openness creates a fertile ground for manipulation, as the manipulator can weave deceptive narratives and exploit emotions. Familiar faces, which typically evoke feelings of safety and trust, can become conduits for betrayal.

The sense of security we derive from these relationships can be weaponized by those with ulterior motives, allowing them to hijack not just personal destinies but also the trajectories of entire Kingdom organizations.

Moreover, Kingdom organizations are particularly susceptible to manipulation due to their hierarchical structures and established protocols.

In a leadership setting, a familiar face might be someone in a position of authority or a peer with whom one has built a rapport. When such individuals engage in deceitful practices, the ramifications can be catastrophic.

Members may find themselves unwittingly complicit in unethical behavior, decisions may be made that compromise the integrity of the organization, and the collective destiny of the group can be irrevocably altered.

The loss of direction and purpose that ensues from such manipulation can lead to disillusionment, diminishing morale and stifling innovation.

The psychological impact of manipulation extends beyond the immediate consequences of betrayal. When individuals or organizations succumb to external influences, they often experience a profound sense of loss—not just of importance, but also of identity.

The journey toward self-discovery and personal fulfillment can become overshadowed by the weight of external expectations and manipulative tactics. This can lead to feelings of inadequacy and erode self-esteem, perpetuating a cycle of dependence on others to dictate one’s life choices.

To combat the threats posed by manipulation, individuals and organizations must cultivate a culture of vigilance and self-awareness. Recognizing the signs of manipulation and understanding the motivations behind familiar faces’ actions is crucial. One should never be under the counsel of one individual, but rather a wise counsel of godly individuals, nor should any ministry be led of a singular leader, but with the foundation of scripture, being that of “Elders”.

Developing critical thinking skills, fostering open communication, and encouraging a healthy skepticism can empower individuals to discern genuine intentions from hidden agendas. Organizations, too, must prioritize ethical leadership and create environments where transparency and accountability are paramount.

In conclusion, the enemy’s pleasure in hijacking the destinies of individuals and organizations underscores a significant challenge in our contemporary landscape.

By harnessing the power of familiarity, manipulators can exploit vulnerabilities and alter trajectories with devastating effects. However, by fostering awareness, promoting Kingdom foundational practices, and nurturing self-confidence, we can safeguard our destinies from the clutches of manipulation.

The journey towards autonomy and fulfillment is ours to navigate, and it begins with recognizing the power we hold over our own narratives.

To avoid such individuals from taking the reigns of a God ordained ministry, and or misleading the Saints, the LORD has His Watchmen set in place:

“The Watchmen of the Lord: Discerners of the Religious Spirit”

In an age where faith and spirituality are often clouded by human-made structures and ideologies, the role of the Watchmen of the Lord takes on paramount significance.

These spiritual guardians possess discerning gifts that enable them to identify the insidious workings of the religious spirit—a force that is territorial, controlling, and highly adept at manipulation.

The spirit of religion, in its essence, seeks to undermine the genuine relationship between individuals and God, masquerading its motives under the guise of piety and righteousness. The religious spirit can be likened to a modern-day Pharisee, operating with a facade of goodness while cloaking its true intentions.

Just as the Pharisees of biblical times employed tactics of intimidation and condemnation, today’s religious spirit seeks to entrap believers within its rigid confines. This manipulation is not always overt; it often presents itself as a “Trojan horse,” deceptively labeled as a desire to do good.

It lures individuals into a false sense of security, where they may unknowingly compromise their spiritual freedom in exchange for acceptance within a structured belief system. However, the true Watchmen of the Lord are not easily swayed by such tactics.

These individuals have undergone a profound transformation—a process of dying to self that allows Christ to take the rightful place on the throne of their lives. This death to self is not about relinquishing identity or purpose but about surrendering to a higher calling, one that transcends human ambition and societal expectations.

As a result, these Watchmen stand firm against the intimidating forces of the religious spirit, embodying the truth that dead men do not fear anything.

The fearlessness of the Watchmen derives from their deep-rooted understanding of God’s sovereignty and grace. They recognize that their strength lies not in their own abilities but in their unwavering faith and reliance on Christ.

This spiritual posture enables them to confront the manipulative tactics of the religious spirit without compromise, exposing its deception and calling others to a more authentic expression of faith.

Through their discernment, the Watchmen illuminate the path for others, guiding them away from the snares of religiosity and toward a genuine relationship with the Lord.

They encourage believers to seek truth beyond the confines of tradition, inviting them to explore the depths of their faith without fear of retribution or judgment.

In doing so, the Watchmen fulfill their divine mandate to protect and nurture the spiritual well-being of their communities. In conclusion, the role of the Watchmen of the Lord is vital in recognizing and addressing the workings of the religious spirit.

Their discerning gifts enable them to spot deception and manipulation, empowering them to stand against intimidation. Through their commitment to die to self and allow Christ to reign, they pave the way for a more authentic experience of faith.

Jesus has not left us orphans nor defenseless in a world rife with challenges to genuine spirituality, for His Watchmen serve as beacons of truth, guiding others toward the freedom and grace that can only be found in a true relationship with God.

~Dr. Russell Welch
Elder / Apostolic Teacher: Highway to Heaven Church and Founder and Shepherd of Remnant Warrior Ministries / Remnant Warrior School of Spiritual Warfare.

If you feel lead to support this ministry you can do so thru this link: Donate


Closing out the debate: Jesus on the Rapture

As we have seen in the previous two post, the concept of the “rapture” has stirred theological debate and speculation among Christians for generations. Many of these discussions often draw from passages like 1 Thessalonians 4, leading to the assumption that Jesus’ teachings in the “Olivet Discourse” (found in Mark 13, Luke 21, and Matthew 24) endorse this notion.

However, an in-depth examination reveals that this interpretation may be fundamentally misaligned with Jesus’ historical context and intent. During Jesus’ life, the sociopolitical landscape of Judea was dominated by the Roman Empire, which ruled with an iron fist.

This oppressive regime fueled a yearning among many Jews for liberation and a militaristic messiah who could lead them to victory over their oppressors. Within this context, the idea of escape, or rapture, may seem appealing to those living under such duress.

However, Jesus presented a radical departure from these expectations, advocating for a message of love and reconciliation rather than rebellion and violence. Consider the subversive nature of Jesus’ teachings, particularly his instruction to “love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you” (Matthew 5).

In a society where conflicts were common and the threat of violence was ever-present, such a message was revolutionary. Rather than inciting his followers to take up arms against the Romans, Jesus urged them to respond to oppression with love and grace.

This approach not only challenged the prevailing notions of power and leadership but also illuminated a spiritual path that transcended physical conflict.

Moreover, when Jesus instructed his followers to “put away your sword” (Matthew 26:52), he directly confronted the hopes of those who sought a warrior savior.

The expectation for a militant messiah was prevalent, yet Jesus embodied a different kind of leadership—one that centered on humility, service, and forgiveness. His mission was not to incite a rebellion but to cultivate a spirit of peace amidst turmoil.

It’s imperative to recognize that rapture, as a concept, was not part of Jesus’ worldview. For him, the notion of resurrection was firmly rooted in the context of this world, not an escape to another realm.

 His teachings reflected a vision of renewal and restoration for the earth, rather than its destruction. The anticipated resurrection was intertwined with the hope of a transformed existence within the same physical reality, emphasizing continuity rather than abandonment.

Thus far, we can see that the idea that Jesus’ teachings support the concept of rapture is a misinterpretation of his message and a misunderstanding of the historical context in which he lived.

Jesus called for an active engagement with the world, advocating for love in the face of hatred and urging his followers to seek peace rather than conflict. By reexamining these teachings, we can appreciate the depth of Jesus’ message—one that invites us to embrace our circumstances with love, rather than seek an escape.

The true essence of his teachings lies in the promise of resurrection and transformation, not in a fleeting notion of rapture. It encourages believers to remain grounded in their faith, embracing the challenges of the present while looking forward to the hope of renewal in the future.

Jesus and the Destruction of Jerusalem: Not “Rapture”

The very mention of the notion of the “rapture” often sparks fervent debate among theologians and laypeople alike. However, it is essential to examine the scriptural basis of these teachings critically, especially regarding Jesus’ prophecies found in Mark 13 and their implications for understanding the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 CE.

While I affirm the belief in a future second coming of Christ, it is crucial to recognize that the central focus of Jesus’ prophetic discourse was not an abstract concept of the rapture but the imminent destruction of the Temple—a significant event in the history of Israel.

Let us go a little further and explore how interpreting Jesus’ teachings in the context of the destruction of Jerusalem offers insights into the urgency of his message, the fulfillment of prophecy, and the implications for contemporary faith.

In Mark 13, Jesus prophesies the ruin of the Temple in Jerusalem, a statement that shocked his disciples and prompted their inquiries about the signs and timing of such catastrophic events. When Jesus states that “not one stone will be left unturned,” he is not merely speaking metaphorically; he is foretelling a tragic reality that would befall the city within “this generation” (Mark 13:30).

This phrase is pivotal; it anchors the prophecy within a historical timeframe relevant to the disciples who heard it. The urgency of Jesus’ message becomes apparent when we consider the signs he enumerates: false messiahs, wars, food shortages, earthquakes, and persecution.

These were not abstract predictions but tangible occurrences that characterized the tumultuous years leading up to the destruction of the Temple in 70 CE. Understanding the prophetic language employed by Jesus is vital for a comprehensive interpretation.

The cosmic signs—such as the sun darkening and the moon dimming—are not to be taken literally but are symbolic of political upheaval and divine judgment. This prophetic style, rooted in Hebrew tradition, serves to convey the gravity of the impending disaster.

Just as modern language employs phrases like “earth-shattering event” to denote significant historical moments without suggesting literal geological upheaval, Jesus uses similar rhetorical devices to communicate the magnitude of Jerusalem’s impending doom.

 Moreover, the emotional weight of Jesus’ prediction cannot be overlooked. His lamentation over the city illustrates that his prophecy was not one of vindictive glee but of profound sorrow.

Jesus deeply cared for Jerusalem and its people, recognizing that their unfaithfulness would lead to their destruction. His declaration that he would be the ultimate Temple in the wake of the physical Temple’s destruction signifies a transformative moment in the relationship between God and humanity.

 Following the destruction, Jesus would stand as the living embodiment of God’s presence—a radical shift in the understanding of worship and divine connection.

As we consider the implications of these prophetic statements for today’s believers, it is crucial to confront the dangers of misinterpretation. The fixation on a “rapture” can lead to escapism, fostering a mentality that neglects the responsibility Christians have to care for creation and engage with the world meaningfully.

 If we envision the world as inherently doomed, we may inadvertently foster apathy toward pressing social and environmental issues. In conclusion, the focus on the destruction of Jerusalem rather than a speculative rapture provides a more profound understanding of Jesus’ message and its urgency.

His prophecies about the Temple’s destruction were fulfilled within the lifetime of his contemporaries, serving as a poignant reminder of the consequences of unfaithfulness.

Rather than viewing this as a distant, nebulous event, we are called to engage with the realities of our world, maintaining a posture of responsibility and hope.

By recognizing the significance of Jesus’ message in its historical context, we can foster a faith that is both grounded in the teachings of Scripture and responsive to the needs of our present day.

Rapture or Resurrection?

The concepts of rapture and resurrection often spark profound discussions among believers and theologians alike, raising questions about the nature of our ultimate fate as described in the New Testament.

At the heart of this discourse lies a vision shared by Jesus, Paul, and the early church—a vision steeped not in the notion of escaping this world but in the promise of resurrection.

This perspective offers a transformative understanding of our embodied future, one that is fundamentally anchored in hope and renewal rather than abandonment. I believe that as a true student of the Word,  it is crucial to recognize that the New Testament presents resurrection as an integral part of the Christian hope.

This is not merely a spiritual or ethereal existence in a distant heaven; rather, it is an embodied future that affirms our physical existence. In 1 Thessalonians 4, Paul articulates the assurance that those who are in Christ will rise, signifying a restored and transformed state of being.

This promise extends beyond humanity to encompass all of creation, affirming that God’s redemptive plan includes liberating the natural world from its “bondage to decay” (Romans 8:21).

This vision of resurrection reaffirms the inherent goodness of the physical world and emphasizes that God’s ultimate design is not destruction but renewal.

Moreover, the idea of a future rapture contrasts sharply with the New Testament’s portrayal of Christ’s return. Instead of anticipating chaos and tribulation, as some interpretations suggest, the early church understood Jesus’ predictions of tribulation as events that had already transpired, particularly with the destruction of Jerusalem and the temple by Rome.

This historical context is pivotal; it shifts the focus from a future panic to a promise of restoration. Revelation, often misinterpreted as a foretelling of doom, when viewed through its historical lens, aligns with this hopeful narrative.

The concluding verses of Revelation encapsulate this assurance: “He will wipe every tear from their eyes. There will be no more death or mourning or crying or pain” (Revelation 21:4).

Such promises underscore the belief that God’s kingdom will triumph over suffering and death. The ultimate hope presented by the New Testament writers is not merely about individual salvation but the collective restoration of creation—a world made right.

This renewed world is destined to be our eternal home, inviting believers to actively participate in manifesting this reality in our present lives. The notion of rapture promotes a mindset of escape, suggesting that believers should look away from the world rather than engage with it.

In contrast, Jesus’ teachings emphasize bringing heaven to earth, embodying His kingdom in our actions and relationships. The Lord’s Prayer itself encapsulates this desire for unity between heaven and earth: “On earth as in heaven.”

 Lastly, it is essential to acknowledge that neither Paul, Jesus, nor any figures of the New Testament supported the idea of the rapture as it is popularly understood today.

This absence of rapture in their teachings invites believers to reconsider their own understanding of the afterlife. The call to embrace resurrection rather than rapture invites a profound shift in perspective—one that encourages living with hope, purpose, and engagement with the world around us.

In conclusion, the hope of resurrection as depicted in the New Testament is a powerful affirmation of life, renewal, and the goodness of creation. This vision challenges the idea of rapture and instead calls for an active participation in the unfolding of God’s kingdom here on earth.

As we navigate our lives, let us hold fast to this promise of resurrection, embodying the hope that, indeed, our world’s future is bright and filled with potential for renewal.

Why?

Because neither Paul nor Jesus believed in the rapture. Neither did any of other New Testament author or figure, and neither should you.

~Dr. Russell Welch
Elder / Teacher: Highway to Heaven Church and Founder and Shepherd of Remnant Warrior Ministries / Remnant Warrior School of Spiritual Warfare.

For further study, you are invited to purchase Dr. Welch’s book “Beyond the Clouds: Unveiling the Rapture Illusion“, Available exclusively on Amazon

If you feel lead to support this ministry you can do so thru this link: Donate


Part one of a three part series………

The Ecclesia in the Acts: Understanding Its Meaning and Significance

The term “ecclesia” has long been embraced by Christadelphians as a replacement for the word “church,” and rightly so. “Ecclesia” carries with it a rich tapestry of meaning and significance, rooted in both history and theology.

However, as with any term that becomes commonplace, there is a risk that its vitality may diminish over time. This raises an important question for believers: How do we truly perceive our ecclesia?

Exploring the depth of this term invites us to consider its historical context and its implications for our communal and individual faith experiences. In the New Testament, particularly in Hebrews 12:18-24, the ecclesia is compared to the Israelites at Mount Sinai, a momentous event in biblical history.

The writer starkly contrasts the terrifying experience of the Israelites with their encounter with God—a scene filled with fire, darkness, and fear—with the ecclesia’s arrival at Mount Zion, the city of the living God. Here, the ecclesia is depicted as part of a celestial assembly, a gathering of angels, just men made perfect, and Jesus, the mediator of a new covenant.

This imagery elevates the ecclesia beyond mere physical assembly, positioning it as an ongoing spiritual reality steeped in divine presence and purpose. The historical roots of the term “ecclesia” can be traced back to ancient Greece, particularly around the fourth century BC.

 It was in this context that a constitution emerged to formalize the governing assembly of Athens, known as the ecclesia. This assembly was comprised of citizens who convened to deliberate on matters of policy, declare war, elect officials, and administer justice.

The term literally means “the called-out ones,” reflecting a sense of community and responsibility among its members. This democratic assembly emphasized ideals of “freedom and equality,” principles that resonate with the communal aspects of the ecclesia in a spiritual sense.

The relevance of the ecclesia transcends its political connotations, extending into the framework of the early Christian community as depicted in the Acts of the Apostles. When Christ spoke to Peter and the apostles in Matthew 16:18, declaring, “Upon this rock, I will build my ecclesia,” He was not introducing a new concept, but rather recontextualizing a term imbued with collective significance.

The early ecclesia, much like the Greek assembly, was called to convene, support one another, and collectively navigate the challenges of faith in a world rife with opposition.

In the Book of Acts, we see the ecclesia in action, as believers come together in unity, sharing resources, and spreading the gospel. However, it is also evident that the term “ecclesia” was not limited to a mere physical gathering.

The events in Acts 19 illustrate how the word “ecclesia” was used to denote both official assemblies and, at times, chaotic gatherings driven by mob mentality.

The case of Demetrius, who incited a riot against Paul and the believers in Ephesus, serves as a cautionary tale about the potential for distortion in communal settings.

Thus, examining the ecclesia through both its historical and biblical lenses reveals a multifaceted understanding of what it means to be part of this assembly.

It challenges believers to recognize their role as part of a larger spiritual community, one that calls for engagement, mutual support, and a commitment to the teachings of Christ.

 As we reflect on our own ecclesia today, we must strive to keep its meaning alive and vibrant. It invites us to ponder how we gather, support one another, and ultimately, how we embody the values and principles established on Sinai and exemplified in the Acts of the Apostles.

By embracing the fullness of the ecclesia, we ensure that it remains a dynamic force for spiritual growth, unity, and service in a world that often seeks to divide. In doing so, we honor its profound legacy and reaffirm our commitment to being the “called-out ones” in every aspect of our lives.

The term “ecclesia,” with its richness in historical and cultural significance, serves as a bridge between the Judaic roots of early Christianity and its evolution into a distinct faith.

With its origins in the Septuagint (LXX), the Greek translation of the Hebrew Bible, ecclesia encapsulates the essence of a gathered community—a concept that resonated deeply with both Jews and early Christians. As we explore its implications, we uncover how this term shaped the understanding of community, authority, and divine purpose in the formative years of the Christian faith.

The Septuagint was created in the 3rd century BC by Jewish scholars in Alexandria, Egypt, who sought to make their sacred texts accessible to a Greek-speaking audience. In this translation, ecclesia appears as a noun seventy-seven times, establishing its foundational role in the relationship between God and His people.

Notably, it was in the context of divine assembly that the term first emerged, as documented in Deuteronomy 4:10, where Moses addresses the Israelites at Mount Sinai, urging them to remember the day of the assembly (ecclesia).

This moment was not merely a historical event; it signified the establishment of a covenant community called to hear God’s words and pass them on to future generations, thereby reinforcing the importance of collective worship and obedience.

Jesus’s use of the word “ecclesia” in Matthew 16:18, where He declares, “upon this rock I will build my ecclesia,” is particularly poignant. His choice of terminology indicates a deliberate connection to the rich history of the term as found in the Septuagint.

By employing ecclesia, Jesus indicated the creation of a new community—the body of believers—rooted in the same principles that defined the assembly of Israel.

The Apostles, familiar with the LXX, understood the weight of this word choice and its implications for their mission. They viewed the ecclesia as a continuation of God’s covenant with His people, tasked with embodying His teachings and spreading the message of salvation.

The comparative study of ecclesia and its Hebrew equivalent, “qahal,” further elucidates its significance. While both terms imply a gathering of people, “qahal” emphasizes the act of being called together by God.

This divine summoning establishes a deeper relationship between the community and their Creator, reflecting a commitment to live in accordance with His will. Barclay’s observation highlights this distinction, noting that ecclesia is not just a congregation that happens to come together; it is a body of people called into action by God.

This understanding is crucial for grasping the nature of the early Christian community, which saw itself as divinely commissioned to fulfill God’s mission on Earth.

Moreover, the early church’s identity was distinct from that of the synagogue, which had become a community space for Jewish worship separate from the temple. While synagogues served an essential role in the Jewish faith, they lacked the transformative purpose that Jesus attributed to His ecclesia.

By establishing a new community, Jesus redefined the concept of worship and fellowship, moving beyond the physical confines of the synagogue to create a spiritual temple made up of believers—an idea echoed in 1 Peter 2:5, where Christians are described as “living stones” being built into a spiritual house.

Thus, we see that the term ecclesia as found in the Septuagint serves as a critical link connecting the Jewish heritage of early Christians to the foundation of their faith.

By understanding its historical context and significance, we can appreciate the profound implications of Jesus’s declaration to build His ecclesia. The early church, rooted in the traditions of Israel, embraced its role as a living embodiment of God’s purpose on Earth, fostering a community designed not only for worship but also for action and outreach.

As we reflect on the rich history of ecclesia, we recognize the enduring call for believers to gather, listen, and respond to God’s voice, thereby continuing the legacy of faith that began millennia ago.

~Dr. Russell Welch
Elder / Teacher: Highway to Heaven Church and Founder and Shepherd of Remnant Warrior Ministries / Remnant Warrior School of Spiritual Warfare.


Jesus on “Rapture”:

Understanding Context and Meaning** The concept of the “rapture” has been a topic of considerable debate within Christian circles, particularly when examining scriptural references such as 1 Thessalonians 4. Many believers look to Jesus’ teachings in the Olivet Discourse—found in Mark 13, Luke 21, and Matthew 24—as a basis for their understanding of this event.

 However, a careful analysis reveals that this interpretation is a departure from the historical and cultural context in which Jesus spoke. Living in the first century, during the height of Roman dominance, Jesus encountered a world rife with turmoil and political oppression. Many Jews, especially those with zealous expectations of a messiah, anticipated a savior who would overthrow Roman rule and establish an earthly kingdom.

 In stark contrast to these expectations, Jesus advocated for a radical message of love and forgiveness, urging his followers to “love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you” (Matthew 5).

This subversive teaching was revolutionary, challenging the prevailing notion of a militaristic messiah and calling for a different kind of engagement with adversaries—one marked by compassion rather than violence. Jesus’ instruction to “put away your sword” served as a profound rebuke to the desire for a warrior king, illustrating that his mission was not to incite rebellion or violence against Rome, but rather to transform hearts.

In this context, it becomes evident that Jesus did not preach an impending escape from earthly woes, but instead sought to address the immediate struggles of his followers and the larger socio-political landscape. The idea of the “rapture”—a sudden removal of believers from the world—was not a concept rooted in his teachings or the understanding of his contemporaries.

Moreover, the apocalyptic language in Mark 13 should not be misconstrued as a prophetic roadmap for a future rapture. Jesus spoke directly to the realities facing his audience, prophesying the destruction of the Temple in 70 CE—a monumental event that fulfilled his warnings about the consequences of unfaithfulness within Israel.

The phrase “this generation” (Mark 13:30) indicates that Jesus’ prophecies were directed toward those who were alive at that time, not a distant future event. The signs he described—wars, persecution, and cosmic upheaval—were all part of the historical context surrounding the impending collapse of Jerusalem, not signs of an eschatological rapture.

The parallel between Jesus’ warnings and the subsequent events of the Jewish War serves to ground his message in reality. The false messiahs, wars, famine, and natural disasters he foretold were not mere symbols but tangible occurrences that would affect the people of his time.

 By understanding these prophecies as reflections of the sociopolitical climate of first-century Judea, we gain a clearer perspective on Jesus’ teachings and their implications. Additionally, the emotive language used by Jesus, which included cosmic imagery, was a rhetorical device rooted in Jewish prophetic tradition.

Such language was not to be taken literally but served to convey the catastrophic impact of political upheaval. Just as contemporary language can describe events in hyperbolic terms—such as calling 9/11 an “earth-shattering event” without implying a literal earthquake—Jesus employed similar expressions to communicate the magnitude of the coming changes.

In conclusion, while belief in a future second coming remains integral to Christian theology, associating Jesus’ teachings in the Olivet Discourse with the modern concept of the rapture misinterprets his message and the historical context in which it was given.

Jesus did not offer a vision of escape; rather, he called his followers to engage with the world through love, compassion, and resilience in the face of adversity. Understanding this distinction enriches our comprehension of his teachings and reinforces the call to address the pressing issues of our time, rather than retreating into a desire for an escape from reality.

Jesus Wept Over His Prediction of Destruction: A Reflection on Hope and Resurrection The image of Jesus weeping over Jerusalem serves as a profound testament to the tension between divine prophecy and human compassion.

This poignant moment, marked by grief and foresight, encapsulates the essence of Christ’s mission on earth. As he gazes upon the city, Jesus is acutely aware of the destructive path that the people have chosen, driven by zeal and misunderstanding.

His tears are not merely for the physical destruction looming on the horizon but resonate with a deeper sorrow for the spiritual blindness that leads to such ruin. This act of lament reveals a heart that longs for redemption and restoration instead of annihilation, inviting us to reflect on the broader implications of his tears.

In the context of Jesus’s lament, it is essential to recognize the significance of the Temple’s destruction. For the Jewish people, the Temple represented the very dwelling place of God, a sacred space that facilitated their relationship with the divine.

However, Jesus’s prediction of its demise marks a pivotal moment in the divine narrative, symbolizing the transition from a physical locus of God’s presence to a new spiritual reality embodied in Christ himself. By referring to himself as the “Son of Man,” an allusion to the prophetic vision found in Daniel 7, Jesus positions himself at the intersection of suffering and vindication, revealing the duality of his identity as both the suffering servant and the glorious Messiah.

The implications of this transition are immense. The destruction of the Temple signifies the end of an era, laying the groundwork for the establishment of a new covenant that transcends geographical and cultural boundaries.

In this new paradigm, Jesus becomes the ultimate Temple, inviting believers into a direct and personal relationship with God. This transformation is not merely prophetic; it serves as a declaration of hope amidst despair. While Jesus weeps for what will be lost, he simultaneously embodies the prophetic truth of resurrection and renewal that is to follow.

The message of hope embedded in Jesus’s lament is echoed in the writings of Paul, particularly in Romans 8, where liberation from decay and the restoration of the world are intimately connected to the resurrection of believers.

Contrary to popular eschatological narratives that emphasize fear and withdrawal, the biblical story exhorts us to engage with the present moment and work toward the transformation of our world. The historical context of the Roman siege of Jerusalem in 70 CE serves as a reminder that tribulation is not to be escaped but confronted with resilience and hope.

Furthermore, the imagery presented in the Book of Revelation underscores this theme of renewal. The culmination of God’s redemptive plan is characterized by the wiping away of tears and the eradication of death and pain.

Rather than envisioning a future that invites us to escape worldly struggles, this vision calls believers to embrace the transformative work of God, actively participating in the renewal of creation. The contrast between the desire for a rapture—a yearning to flee from earthly difficulties—and Jesus’s mission to incarnate hope amidst struggle could not be starker.

His call is to embrace the world and reflect the future glory of God’s kingdom in our present lives. In conclusion, the profound emotional response of Jesus toward Jerusalem invites us to reevaluate our understanding of eschatology.

Our focus should shift from anticipating a distant, chaotic end to embracing a narrative steeped in resurrection and restoration. The hope embedded in Jesus’s teachings and the overarching New Testament message paints a picture of a renewed world where justice flourishes and life abounds.

As we navigate the complexities of our challenges, we must remember that our future is not one of abandonment but divine fulfillment—an invitation to reflect this truth in our current actions and attitudes.

Therefore, like Jesus, we, too, can weep for the brokenness of our world while remaining steadfast in our hope for renewal that lies ahead. Our tears can become seeds of hope, inspiring us to work towards a transformed future defined by love, justice, and grace.

Fellow students of the Word, as we navigate the complexities of theological beliefs, it is essential to return to the foundational teachings of Scripture and reevaluate our understanding of key concepts like the rapture in light of the Apostle Paul’s timeless message.

In the end we find that the doctrine of the Rapture, when examined through a critical lens, reveals itself to be both unbiblical and illogical. The lack of scriptural foundation, coupled with internal contradictions, suggests that this doctrine may not merely be an alternative interpretation but rather a belief that should be rejected.

Whether viewed through the lens of biblical integrity or logical consistency, the Rapture raises profound questions that challenge its acceptance within Christian doctrine. As believers, it is essential to engage in thoughtful discourse and discernment, seeking clarity on theological matters that shape our understanding of faith and salvation.

Ultimately, the examination of the Rapture presents an opportunity for deeper reflection on the nature of God’s promises and the true meaning of Christ’s return.

~Dr. Russell Welch
Elder / Teacher: Highway to Heaven Church and Founder and Shepherd of Remnant Warrior Ministries / Remnant Warrior School of Spiritual Warfare.


The doctrine of the Rapture, a widely debated topic within Christian eschatology, raises profound questions regarding its scriptural basis and logical coherence. After engaging in discussions about the Rapture, it becomes apparent that there are significant issues surrounding its interpretation.

Over the next two days I will lay out the argument that I have used in several debates (which I was considered the winner) that aims to explore whether the Rapture is simply an error of interpretation, a matter of differing viewpoints, or a doctrine that should be firmly rejected. Through a critical analysis, it becomes evident that the Rapture is not only unbiblical but also illogical, prompting a reevaluation of its legitimacy in the context of Christian belief.

First and foremost, the argument that the Rapture is unbiblical is compelling. A fundamental issue is the absence of any explicit mention of a distinct Rapture event in the Scriptures, separate from the Second Coming of Jesus Christ. Proponents of the doctrine often dissect various biblical passages, claiming that some refer to the Rapture while others pertain to the Second Coming.

Yet, this division is made without clear scriptural justification. The assumption that there exists a Rapture necessitates a prior belief in its existence, which leads to a circular interpretation of Scripture. To accept the Rapture, one must first impose the concept onto the biblical text rather than deriving it from a straightforward reading of scripture itself.

This poses a fundamental challenge to its validity as a doctrine grounded in scriptural truth. Moreover, the illogical nature of the Rapture doctrine further undermines its credibility. The doctrine presents a series of contradictions that defy rational thought.

For instance, proponents claim that the Rapture is the coming of Christ yet argue that it is not the Second Coming. This paradox begs the question: how can an event that is described as a coming of Christ not be acknowledged as His return?

Such semantic gymnastics create confusion and render the doctrine incoherent. Additionally, the assertion that the Rapture occurs on the “Last Day,” while simultaneously suggesting it can happen years prior, raises further questions regarding its consistency.

If the Rapture is indeed the resurrection of believers, it cannot logically occur before the Last Day, as Scripture explicitly states that resurrection takes place then. This inconsistency highlights a fundamental flaw in the doctrine’s framework.

Furthermore, the implications of the Rapture doctrine raise significant theological concerns. If believers are to be taken up in a Rapture before the end of the world, what becomes of Christ’s promises regarding eternal life and resurrection on the Last Day?

The biblical promise that those who believe in Him will be raised on the Last Day appears to contradict the Rapture narrative. This contradiction not only challenges the reliability of Jesus’ words but also calls into question whether the doctrine diminishes the integrity of the biblical message.

If Christ’s promises are rendered obsolete for those who come to faith after the supposed Rapture, the doctrine potentially transforms the nature of salvation and the promises of God.

But again, lets take a closer look at one of the key passage the escapist like to stand on which is 1 Thessalonians 4:15-17, where the Apostle Paul addresses the concerns of the Christian community in Thessalonica regarding the fate of those who have died before Christ’s return.

However, upon closer examination, it becomes apparent that Paul’s intent was not to outline an escapist theology but to articulate a hope grounded in bodily resurrection and the ultimate reunion of believers at Christ’s return to earth. For a brief moment, let us dive into the nuances of Paul’s language, the Greek terminology he employed, and the broader implications of his teachings, ultimately arguing that the rapture, as commonly understood, is a misinterpretation of the biblical text.

To grasp Paul’s message in 1 Thessalonians, it is essential to recognize the context in which he wrote. The Thessalonian church was grappling with questions surrounding death and the second coming of Christ.

Paul reassures them that those who have died—referred to metaphorically as “fallen asleep”—are not lost or forsaken but will be resurrected at the Lord’s coming. He emphasizes a shared destiny for both the living and the deceased, portraying the return of Christ as a joyous event marked by a physical resurrection, rather than a sudden evacuation from the earth.

The phrase “caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air” has often been interpreted as a promise of escaping earthly existence. However, when viewed in the larger context of Pauline theology, particularly in tandem with his writings in 1 Corinthians 15 and Romans 8, it becomes evident that the emphasis is not on leaving the earth but on the transformation and glorification of believers at Christ’s return.

 One focal point of this analysis is the interpretation of the Greek term “ἀήρ” (air), which Paul uses in this passage. Many contemporary interpretations associate this term with “sky,” suggesting a heavenly ascent. However, a closer examination reveals that “ἀήρ” refers specifically to the lower and denser atmosphere.

This distinction is critical; it indicates that Paul was not advocating for a departure into the upper realms of heaven but rather a transformative encounter in the earthly atmosphere.

Contrastingly, the Greek term for heaven, “οὐρανός,” connotes a higher, transcendent space. By choosing “ἀήρ” over “οὐρανός,” Paul highlights a connection to the earthly realm, reinforcing the notion that the ultimate goal is not escape but resurrection and reuniting with Christ, who is returning to earth.

Furthermore, the mixed metaphors present in Paul’s language complicate the rapture narrative. The imagery of being “caught up” is not indicative of a one-time event but rather a communal experience that celebrates the fulfillment of God’s promise of resurrection.

Paul’s use of metaphoric language reflects his intent to convey hope and assurance rather than a detailed blueprint of end-time events. It is vital to acknowledge that Paul, like Jesus, did not envision a distant future characterized by a Great Tribulation or a need for believers to be evacuated from the planet. Instead, both figures shared a vision of God’s kingdom coming to fruition on earth, culminating in a physical resurrection that included all believers.

Thus we find that the belief in the rapture, as popularly understood, seems to diverge significantly from the teachings of Paul and the intentions of the biblical text.

By analyzing the linguistic choices and the broader context of 1 Thessalonians, it becomes clear that Paul’s message centers on resurrection, hope, and the ultimate fulfillment of God’s promises in the physical realm.

Rather than an escape to the heavens, Paul offers a vision of restoration and reunion that invites believers to embrace their earthly existence while looking forward to a transformative encounter with Christ.

But let us continue in the realm of biblical interpretation, Paul’s use of mixed metaphors serves as a powerful tool for conveying profound theological concepts. His connections to the Old Testament, particularly through the figures of Moses and the imagery from Daniel, illuminate his understanding of God’s relationship with humanity and the nature of Christ’s return.

By examining these metaphors, we can grasp the depth of Paul’s message and its implications for the early Christian community, particularly in the face of persecution.

The first metaphor Paul employs is that of Moses descending from Mount Sinai with the Law, heralded by the blast of a trumpet. This powerful image evokes the moment when God descended to meet Moses, establishing a divine-human connection that highlights God’s initiative to engage with humanity.

In this context, God’s trajectory is downward, symbolizing His willingness to come to us, rather than demanding that we ascend to Him. This downward motion invites reflection on the nature of divine authority and the responsibilities of those who receive God’s revelation.

Moses’s ascent to the mountaintop signifies a moment of divine encounter, yet it is the act of coming down that emphasizes the importance of service and accessibility. Paul’s metaphor encourages believers to embody this same movement—leaving behind the heights of spiritual privilege to serve and uplift those who are “below.”

The second image Paul draws upon originates from the Book of Daniel, where the “one like the son of man” represents the vindication of God’s people over their adversaries. Here, clouds symbolize divine authority and judgment, reinforcing the idea that God’s intervention is both powerful and redemptive.

In applying this metaphor to the early Christian community, Paul reassures believers facing persecution that their suffering is not in vain. Rather, it is a part of a larger narrative in which God will ultimately rescue and restore His people.

This theme resonates deeply with those who find themselves marginalized or oppressed, offering hope in the promise of vindication and divine justice.

Moreover, Paul introduces a third image that transcends the biblical narrative—an emperor visiting a city, welcomed by a jubilant procession.

This metaphor captures the anticipation of Christ’s return and the role of the church as an active participant in ushering in the Kingdom of God. The imagery of a royal procession implies a sense of communal expectation and celebration, inviting believers to envision themselves as heralds of a new creation.

Again, contrary to popular interpretations of the “rapture,” Paul’s portrayal emphasizes a collective, rather than individualistic, experience of Christ’s return. This understanding aligns with his broader theological framework, where resurrection and restoration take precedence over mere escape from earthly trials.

Ultimately, Paul’s mixed metaphors paint a rich tapestry of hope and purpose for the Christian community. Through these images, he articulates a vision of God’s kingdom that transcends the temporal and physical confines of our world.

Rather than promoting a theology centered on escaping the earth, Paul envisions a future where heaven and earth unite in harmony, establishing a perpetual, divine reign on this planet. This eschatological view emphasizes resurrection, healing, and the establishment of God’s eternal kingdom, fostering a sense of belonging and mission within the community of believers.

In exploring Paul’s metaphors, we are reminded that he is not the sole voice in this conversation—Jesus’ teachings and actions also warrant consideration. As we engage with the broader narrative of scripture, we can deepen our understanding of the profound implications of Christ’s return and what it means for our lives today.

Through this exploration, we are called not only to anticipate the future but to actively participate in the unfolding of God’s kingdom in the here and now, embodying the love and grace that reflect the heart of the divine.

In the part two of this thread, we will dive into the scriptures and look at what Jesus taught or didn’t teach about the rapture.

~Dr. Russell Welch
Elder / Teacher: Highway to Heaven Church and Founder and Shepherd of Remnant Warrior Ministries / Remnant Warrior School of Spiritual Warfare.