Jesus | Radical Disciples - A Remnant Revolution

Posts Tagged ‘Jesus’

The Rise of the Franchise Church Model: A Reflection on 1 Corinthians 3:11

In 1 Corinthians 3:11, the Apostle Paul asserts, “For no one can lay a foundation other than that which is laid, which is Jesus Christ.” This verse emphasizes the importance of grounding our faith and church practices in the truth of Scripture, particularly in the teachings and person of Jesus Christ.

In light of this biblical foundation, the emergence of the franchise church model raises critical questions about the authenticity and integrity of modern church practices. These franchise churches, often characterized by their corporate-like structure and marketing strategies, may represent a departure from the scriptural truths that should govern the life of the church.

The franchise church model often prioritizes growth and brand recognition over spiritual depth and community. Marketing strategies are employed to attract congregants, focusing on appealing aesthetics, entertainment, and consumer-driven experiences rather than the transformative power of the Gospel.

While there is nothing inherently wrong with utilizing modern tools to reach people, the risk lies in the potential dilution of the message. When churches operate like franchises, they may inadvertently build “houses of flesh,” as Paul might describe—structures focused on human ingenuity and appeal rather than divine truth.

This model can lead to an environment where the teachings of Scripture are secondary to the success of the church as a business. The emphasis shifts from discipleship and deep-rooted faith to numbers and profits. In an effort to cater to the preferences of a diverse audience, core biblical tenets may be bent or even abandoned, compromising the very foundation upon which the church should stand.

When congregations prioritize convenience and entertainment, they risk losing the rich tapestry of community, accountability, and spiritual growth that comes from a church firmly rooted in Scripture.

Moreover, the franchise church model often promotes a consumer mentality among congregants, who may view their relationship with the church as transactional. Instead of engaging in a commitment to a faith community characterized by mutual support and accountability, individuals may flit between congregations, seeking the latest program or the most engaging sermon.

This transient approach can undermine the biblical understanding of the church as the body of Christ, where believers are called to be active participants in each other’s lives and spiritual journeys. In contrast, a church established upon the foundation of Christ and anchored in Scripture fosters an environment of authenticity, growth, and genuine community.

When a church prioritizes biblical teaching, worship, and discipleship, it cultivates a space where believers can explore their faith deeply, encourage one another, and engage in the mission of the church with a sense of purpose.

These churches can create lasting impacts that resonate far beyond numerical growth, fostering spiritual maturity and resilience in their congregations. In conclusion, as we reflect on the implications of 1 Corinthians 3:11, it is crucial to evaluate the rise of the franchise church model with discernment.

While the desire to reach people and spread the Gospel is commendable, we must ensure that our methods align with the truth of Scripture and the foundational teachings of Jesus Christ.

By prioritizing spiritual depth over numerical success, we can build churches that reflect the heart of God and fulfill the mission of His kingdom. It is in this commitment to authenticity and Scriptural truth that we find the true essence of what it means to be the Church, the body of Christ in a world that desperately needs His light.

Once could look at our nation as a whole and rightly come to the conclusion that every area of moral decline is aspects of society that the Church compromised on. The Church of Jesus Christ is one that is purposed to transform cultures, not be transformed by them.

In conclusion, the analysis of the franchise model’s societal effects in contrast to the historical impact of the early Church poses critical questions about cultural engagement today. The challenges faced by contemporary communities necessitate a strong, uncompromised Church that understands its mission—one of transformation, dedication to God’s Kingdom, and reflection of Christ’s love and righteousness.

If you were to study cities that have seen a increasing rise of the Franchise model, would you find a change in the culture? Stats show that is not the case, in fact in many of those communities crime, poverty, corrupt governments, increasing levels of high school drop out just to name a few which inherently connected to the cultures that evil fosters.

Yet when you take a look at the societal impact that the early Church had, you will notice that they were able to impact the culture with the Kingdom, to were after 300 plus years, the Emperor Constantine took notice at how they were a people who walked in the extraordinary favor of the Lord God.

As this generation anticipates a profound move of God within society, there lies an invitation for believers to engage prayerfully and actively in culture, reclaiming the Kingdom of God’s values for their communities. Through repentance and renewed commitment to Christ’s principles, there is hope that the Church can again be a transformative influence, showing the world how to walk in the righteous and godly ways for which they were created.

I believe that we are on the verge of witnessing Heaven addressing these issues and our generation at this time in history is about to have a front row to Heaven’s invasion of the cultures of this world, and that is going to happen via the Houses of God that repent and turn back to the Cristo-centric foundation of Church governance, with a red-line distinction between those who remain compromised and those who turn back to seeking the King’s Kingdom and His Righteousness.

~Dr. Russell Welch
Elder / Teacher: Highway to Heaven Church and Founder and Shepherd of Remnant Warrior Ministries / Remnant Warrior School of Spiritual Warfare.

If you feel lead to support this ministry you can do so thru this link: Donate

The unveiling of the Rapid Response Remnant Warrior Regiments

Posted: November 29, 2024 in Kingdom Teaching, Prophetic, Remnant, Spiritual warfare
Tags: bible, faith, Jesus, Kingdom living, Kingdom teaching, prayer, radical christianity, Spirit led life, Spiritual warfare

In the intricate tapestry of faith and existence, the concept of divine redemption stands as a beacon of hope amidst an ongoing spiritual battle.

This spiritual warfare is not a distant or abstract notion; it is a fervent reality that wrestles against God’s plan of salvation, positioning believers in a crucial moment of history.

As the world continues to spiral into confusion, where virtues are inverted and true Christianity finds itself under siege, we must confront the challenges head-on.

In the face of this adversity, the call to action resonates strongly: “Wake up the mighty men.” This rallying cry from the prophet Joel emphasizes the need for warriors within the faith to transform their tools of labor into weapons of spiritual resilience.

We are living in a time reflective of the insights shared by the Apostle Paul in 2 Timothy 3:1–9, a period characterized by perilous conditions.

The enemies of God are not limited to external forces; they manifest in the rise of counterfeit faiths and a burgeoning apostate church that distorts the essence of true belief.

The landscape is frightening, reminiscent of Gideon’s time, when doubt and fear clouded the vision of God’s people. Gideon’s encounter with God serves as a profound reminder that even in our weakest moments, divine strength can propel us to fulfill our purpose.

Just as God urged Gideon to embrace his existing strength and step into his calling, we too are invited to confront our spiritual battles with renewed resolve.

It is essential for believers to realize that our victory does not stem from human strength or wisdom. This is a profound paradox of Christianity: while the world values power and intellect, God’s kingdom operates on a different paradigm.

He chooses the humble, the weak, and the seemingly insignificant to accomplish His will. Our strength lies not in our capabilities but in our willingness to lean into the divine.

The arm of flesh cannot provide the salvation we seek; only the power of God can secure our triumph over adversity. This moment calls for a radical awakening among the faithful.

We must reject discouragement and the temptation to retreat in fear. The challenges we face are not insurmountable; they are opportunities for God’s might to be revealed.

As we gather to confront the principalities and powers that wage war against the Body of Christ, we must resonate with confidence, knowing that the Lord is with us.

This assurance should embolden us to march forward, wielding the strength we possess and trusting in God’s overarching plan. In the current hour, we find ourselves at a critical juncture where the call to action is clear: awaken the mighty within us.

The battle is intense, but we are not alone. With the paradox of God’s wisdom and strength as our foundation, we can rise above the chaos and fulfill our divine purpose.

As we engage in this spiritual warfare, let us remember that our victory lies not in human endeavors but in our commitment to God’s will and the power He provides. The time for action is now; let us not hesitate, for the world is watching, and the call from heaven is resounding.

Recently, during a moment of prayer, I felt a profound message from the Holy Spirit stating that the Father has commissioned the formation of the “Rapid Response Remnant Regiments.”

This group of spiritual warriors, reminiscent of the heroes who bravely confronted the aftermath of the violent attacks on our nation on September 11, 2001, embodies a proactive stance against the forces that threaten our peace and well-being.

Unlike those who remain passive, these valiant individuals take bold action to confront their adversaries, understanding the critical importance of their role in the spiritual realm.

The heroes of our past, such as the first responders on September 11, 2001, and all those who enlisted in our Military following this attack exemplify courage and determination.

They faced unprecedented circumstances head-on, unflinchingly entering chaos to provide aid and protection to others.

Similarly, the Rapid Response Remnant Regiments are called to engage in spiritual battles with the same fierce commitment. These warriors do not wait idly for threats to materialize; instead, they actively seek to dismantle the schemes of the enemy.

The urgency of their mission reflects a deep understanding of the authority bestowed upon them, as they operate under the commission of Holy and Divine purpose.

Central to the identity of these spiritual warriors is their awareness of the power they wield in prayer. Each member of the Remnant understands that their prayers are not merely verbal expressions but potent tools of warfare.

Backed by the very authority of the throne room stationed above the heavenly realm, their prayers become like precision guided missiles—targeted and effective in seeking out the enemy’s strongholds.

With unwavering faith, they engage in prayer that transcends physical limitations, delving into the spiritual dimensions where true battles are fought.

As they pray, they invoke divine intervention, dismantling barriers and bringing forth liberation for those shackled by darkness.

The imagery of precision guided missiles is a powerful metaphor for the effectiveness of focused prayer.

Just as missiles are designed to strike specific targets, the prayers of the Rapid Response Remnant are aimed at particular strongholds established by the enemy.

These strongholds may manifest in various forms—oppression, despair, division, and fear—but through concentrated prayer, the Remnant can create waves of spiritual upheaval that disrupt the enemy’s plans.

This is not a call to arms in a physical sense, but rather an invitation to engage in a profound spiritual battle where faith becomes the weapon of choice.

My wife and I were blessed to have been trained up in such powerful abilities of prayer during our mentorship at Ministry Matrix under the fathering of Dr. Don Lynch, where he had established a powerful setting for Spiritual Warfare in our weekly prayer meetings called “David’s Mighty Army”.

It was during those meetings that we were trained in prayers to impact our families, neighborhoods, schools cities states, and nation government, and even into the revelation of our prayers impacting the nations.

In this hour, as the Father raises up these Remnant Spiritual Warriors, it is essential for individuals to recognize their own role in this movement. Each believer is invited to step into their God-given authority, understanding that every prayer, no matter how small, contributes to the larger fight against the forces of darkness.

The call to action is clear: the time for complacency has passed. We are urged to unite, to pray fervently, and to take our places as warriors on the spiritual frontlines.

The need for Rapid Response Remnant Regiments is not merely a reflection of societal challenges but a recognition of the spiritual realities that underpin our world.

As we navigate through tumultuous times, it becomes increasingly vital to engage in this spiritual warfare with the confidence that we are not alone. With the backing of the Holy Spirit and the authority of the Father, we can impact our communities, transform lives, and dismantle the strongholds that have taken root.

In conclusion, the emergence of the Rapid Response Remnant Regiments serves as a clarion call for believers everywhere. It is an invitation to rise, to take up the mantle of spiritual warfare, and to act with intention and purpose.

As we engage in prayer with the authority given to us, let us remember that we are equipped for this battle. Our prayers are powerful, and together, we can bring about transformative change in a world that desperately needs hope and healing.

The time to stand firm and fight is now; the Rapid Response Remnant is rising, and their mission is clear.

~Dr. Russell Welch
Elder / Teacher: Highway to Heaven Church and Founder and Shepherd of Remnant Warrior Ministries / Remnant Warrior School of Spiritual Warfare.

Remnant Warrior School of Spiritual Warfare

If you feel lead to support this ministry you can do so thru this link: Donate

The Rapture: Bible Truth or Christian Error Part Three

Posted: November 25, 2024 in Kingdom Teaching, Remnant, teaching
Tags: bible, christianity, False Rapture Doctrine, God, Jesus, Kingdom living, Kingdom teaching, rapture, Spirit led life, The Rapture

Closing out the debate: Jesus on the Rapture

As we have seen in the previous two post, the concept of the “rapture” has stirred theological debate and speculation among Christians for generations. Many of these discussions often draw from passages like 1 Thessalonians 4, leading to the assumption that Jesus’ teachings in the “Olivet Discourse” (found in Mark 13, Luke 21, and Matthew 24) endorse this notion.

However, an in-depth examination reveals that this interpretation may be fundamentally misaligned with Jesus’ historical context and intent. During Jesus’ life, the sociopolitical landscape of Judea was dominated by the Roman Empire, which ruled with an iron fist.

This oppressive regime fueled a yearning among many Jews for liberation and a militaristic messiah who could lead them to victory over their oppressors. Within this context, the idea of escape, or rapture, may seem appealing to those living under such duress.

However, Jesus presented a radical departure from these expectations, advocating for a message of love and reconciliation rather than rebellion and violence. Consider the subversive nature of Jesus’ teachings, particularly his instruction to “love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you” (Matthew 5).

In a society where conflicts were common and the threat of violence was ever-present, such a message was revolutionary. Rather than inciting his followers to take up arms against the Romans, Jesus urged them to respond to oppression with love and grace.

This approach not only challenged the prevailing notions of power and leadership but also illuminated a spiritual path that transcended physical conflict.

Moreover, when Jesus instructed his followers to “put away your sword” (Matthew 26:52), he directly confronted the hopes of those who sought a warrior savior.

The expectation for a militant messiah was prevalent, yet Jesus embodied a different kind of leadership—one that centered on humility, service, and forgiveness. His mission was not to incite a rebellion but to cultivate a spirit of peace amidst turmoil.

It’s imperative to recognize that rapture, as a concept, was not part of Jesus’ worldview. For him, the notion of resurrection was firmly rooted in the context of this world, not an escape to another realm.

His teachings reflected a vision of renewal and restoration for the earth, rather than its destruction. The anticipated resurrection was intertwined with the hope of a transformed existence within the same physical reality, emphasizing continuity rather than abandonment.

Thus far, we can see that the idea that Jesus’ teachings support the concept of rapture is a misinterpretation of his message and a misunderstanding of the historical context in which he lived.

Jesus called for an active engagement with the world, advocating for love in the face of hatred and urging his followers to seek peace rather than conflict. By reexamining these teachings, we can appreciate the depth of Jesus’ message—one that invites us to embrace our circumstances with love, rather than seek an escape.

The true essence of his teachings lies in the promise of resurrection and transformation, not in a fleeting notion of rapture. It encourages believers to remain grounded in their faith, embracing the challenges of the present while looking forward to the hope of renewal in the future.

Jesus and the Destruction of Jerusalem: Not “Rapture”

The very mention of the notion of the “rapture” often sparks fervent debate among theologians and laypeople alike. However, it is essential to examine the scriptural basis of these teachings critically, especially regarding Jesus’ prophecies found in Mark 13 and their implications for understanding the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 CE.

While I affirm the belief in a future second coming of Christ, it is crucial to recognize that the central focus of Jesus’ prophetic discourse was not an abstract concept of the rapture but the imminent destruction of the Temple—a significant event in the history of Israel.

Let us go a little further and explore how interpreting Jesus’ teachings in the context of the destruction of Jerusalem offers insights into the urgency of his message, the fulfillment of prophecy, and the implications for contemporary faith.

In Mark 13, Jesus prophesies the ruin of the Temple in Jerusalem, a statement that shocked his disciples and prompted their inquiries about the signs and timing of such catastrophic events. When Jesus states that “not one stone will be left unturned,” he is not merely speaking metaphorically; he is foretelling a tragic reality that would befall the city within “this generation” (Mark 13:30).

This phrase is pivotal; it anchors the prophecy within a historical timeframe relevant to the disciples who heard it. The urgency of Jesus’ message becomes apparent when we consider the signs he enumerates: false messiahs, wars, food shortages, earthquakes, and persecution.

These were not abstract predictions but tangible occurrences that characterized the tumultuous years leading up to the destruction of the Temple in 70 CE. Understanding the prophetic language employed by Jesus is vital for a comprehensive interpretation.

The cosmic signs—such as the sun darkening and the moon dimming—are not to be taken literally but are symbolic of political upheaval and divine judgment. This prophetic style, rooted in Hebrew tradition, serves to convey the gravity of the impending disaster.

Just as modern language employs phrases like “earth-shattering event” to denote significant historical moments without suggesting literal geological upheaval, Jesus uses similar rhetorical devices to communicate the magnitude of Jerusalem’s impending doom.

Moreover, the emotional weight of Jesus’ prediction cannot be overlooked. His lamentation over the city illustrates that his prophecy was not one of vindictive glee but of profound sorrow.

Jesus deeply cared for Jerusalem and its people, recognizing that their unfaithfulness would lead to their destruction. His declaration that he would be the ultimate Temple in the wake of the physical Temple’s destruction signifies a transformative moment in the relationship between God and humanity.

Following the destruction, Jesus would stand as the living embodiment of God’s presence—a radical shift in the understanding of worship and divine connection.

As we consider the implications of these prophetic statements for today’s believers, it is crucial to confront the dangers of misinterpretation. The fixation on a “rapture” can lead to escapism, fostering a mentality that neglects the responsibility Christians have to care for creation and engage with the world meaningfully.

If we envision the world as inherently doomed, we may inadvertently foster apathy toward pressing social and environmental issues. In conclusion, the focus on the destruction of Jerusalem rather than a speculative rapture provides a more profound understanding of Jesus’ message and its urgency.

His prophecies about the Temple’s destruction were fulfilled within the lifetime of his contemporaries, serving as a poignant reminder of the consequences of unfaithfulness.

Rather than viewing this as a distant, nebulous event, we are called to engage with the realities of our world, maintaining a posture of responsibility and hope.

By recognizing the significance of Jesus’ message in its historical context, we can foster a faith that is both grounded in the teachings of Scripture and responsive to the needs of our present day.

Rapture or Resurrection?

The concepts of rapture and resurrection often spark profound discussions among believers and theologians alike, raising questions about the nature of our ultimate fate as described in the New Testament.

At the heart of this discourse lies a vision shared by Jesus, Paul, and the early church—a vision steeped not in the notion of escaping this world but in the promise of resurrection.

This perspective offers a transformative understanding of our embodied future, one that is fundamentally anchored in hope and renewal rather than abandonment. I believe that as a true student of the Word, it is crucial to recognize that the New Testament presents resurrection as an integral part of the Christian hope.

This is not merely a spiritual or ethereal existence in a distant heaven; rather, it is an embodied future that affirms our physical existence. In 1 Thessalonians 4, Paul articulates the assurance that those who are in Christ will rise, signifying a restored and transformed state of being.

This promise extends beyond humanity to encompass all of creation, affirming that God’s redemptive plan includes liberating the natural world from its “bondage to decay” (Romans 8:21).

This vision of resurrection reaffirms the inherent goodness of the physical world and emphasizes that God’s ultimate design is not destruction but renewal.

Moreover, the idea of a future rapture contrasts sharply with the New Testament’s portrayal of Christ’s return. Instead of anticipating chaos and tribulation, as some interpretations suggest, the early church understood Jesus’ predictions of tribulation as events that had already transpired, particularly with the destruction of Jerusalem and the temple by Rome.

This historical context is pivotal; it shifts the focus from a future panic to a promise of restoration. Revelation, often misinterpreted as a foretelling of doom, when viewed through its historical lens, aligns with this hopeful narrative.

The concluding verses of Revelation encapsulate this assurance: “He will wipe every tear from their eyes. There will be no more death or mourning or crying or pain” (Revelation 21:4).

Such promises underscore the belief that God’s kingdom will triumph over suffering and death. The ultimate hope presented by the New Testament writers is not merely about individual salvation but the collective restoration of creation—a world made right.

This renewed world is destined to be our eternal home, inviting believers to actively participate in manifesting this reality in our present lives. The notion of rapture promotes a mindset of escape, suggesting that believers should look away from the world rather than engage with it.

In contrast, Jesus’ teachings emphasize bringing heaven to earth, embodying His kingdom in our actions and relationships. The Lord’s Prayer itself encapsulates this desire for unity between heaven and earth: “On earth as in heaven.”

Lastly, it is essential to acknowledge that neither Paul, Jesus, nor any figures of the New Testament supported the idea of the rapture as it is popularly understood today.

This absence of rapture in their teachings invites believers to reconsider their own understanding of the afterlife. The call to embrace resurrection rather than rapture invites a profound shift in perspective—one that encourages living with hope, purpose, and engagement with the world around us.

In conclusion, the hope of resurrection as depicted in the New Testament is a powerful affirmation of life, renewal, and the goodness of creation. This vision challenges the idea of rapture and instead calls for an active participation in the unfolding of God’s kingdom here on earth.

As we navigate our lives, let us hold fast to this promise of resurrection, embodying the hope that, indeed, our world’s future is bright and filled with potential for renewal.

Why?

Because neither Paul nor Jesus believed in the rapture. Neither did any of other New Testament author or figure, and neither should you.

~Dr. Russell Welch
Elder / Teacher: Highway to Heaven Church and Founder and Shepherd of Remnant Warrior Ministries / Remnant Warrior School of Spiritual Warfare.

For further study, you are invited to purchase Dr. Welch’s book “Beyond the Clouds: Unveiling the Rapture Illusion“, Available exclusively on Amazon

If you feel lead to support this ministry you can do so thru this link: Donate

History of the Ecclesia of Jesus Christ, Part Two

Posted: November 23, 2024 in disciples life, Kingdom Teaching, Remnant, Spirit-Wind People, teaching
Tags: bible, christianity, church, Ecclesia, faith, Jesus, kingdom growth, Kingdom living, Spirit led life

In the heart of the Christian faith lies a profound promise articulated by the Lord Jesus in Matthew 16:18, where He declares, “… thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.”

This assertion highlights not only the foundational role of Peter but also emphasizes Christ’s personal involvement in the establishment and nurturing of His ecclesia. The term “ecclesia,” often translated as “church,” signifies more than just a physical gathering; it embodies the spiritual community of believers united under Christ’s authority.

As we dive into this text, we discover that the inception of the ecclesia is intricately linked to Jesus’ death and resurrection, which serves as the cornerstone for a new covenant with humanity. The imagery of the temple plays a significant role in understanding this relationship.

In John 2:19, Jesus prophesies, “Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up,” referring to His body as the true temple. The physical temple, built by human hands, would ultimately be replaced by a spiritual edifice, symbolizing the ecclesia—a community where God dwells not in brick and mortar but in the hearts of believers.

This transition from a physical to a spiritual temple signifies a monumental shift in how God relates to humanity. While the Jewish leaders misunderstood His words, the essence of Christ’s message underscores His mission to form a new covenant community of faith. As we progress into the Acts of the Apostles, the active hand of Jesus is unmistakably present.

Historically, this book could aptly be titled “The Acts of Jesus Christ After His Ascension,” as it details how the risen Lord continues to work through His apostles. Luke introduces this narrative by referencing his previous writings, emphasizing that what Jesus “began both to do and teach” is merely the precursor to the ongoing work of Christ through the Spirit.

Notably, in Acts 2:33, we learn that Jesus has poured out Holy Spirit upon His followers, a clear indication that He is intimately involved in guiding and empowering His ecclesia. Furthermore, Acts 2:47 states, “the Lord added to the church daily such as should be saved.” This raises intriguing questions about the identity of “the Lord” in this verse—whether it refers to God or Jesus.

Given the context of Jesus’ promise to build His ecclesia, it is plausible to interpret this as a reference to Christ’s direct involvement in the growth and vitality of the church. As believers are added to the ecclesia, it becomes evident that Jesus is not a distant figure but an active participant in the life of His followers.

The narrative progresses as we encounter Stephen, who sees Jesus standing at the right hand of God (Acts 7:56). This posture is significant; it implies that Jesus is not merely a passive observer but an active advocate for His people.

When Paul encounters Jesus on the road to Damascus, he learns that the persecutions of the ecclesia are, in essence, persecutions of Christ Himself (Acts 9:4-5). This deep connection reinforces the idea that Jesus is not detached but rather profoundly engaged with His body, the church.

The promise of Jesus in Matthew 28:20, “I am with you always, even unto the end of the world,” resonates powerfully in the context of His ongoing relationship with the ecclesia. He is present, active, and engaged with His people, reminding us that His commitment to the church transcends time and space.

The imagery of Jesus in Revelation presents Him not as a distant deity but as the glorified Son of Man, actively walking among the seven candlesticks—representing the ecclesia—symbolizing His intimate knowledge of their struggles and triumphs. In this light, believers are invited to consider the reality of Christ’s presence within their midst.

The book of Revelation serves as a vivid reminder that Jesus is not just a historical figure but an active and living presence in the ecclesia today. The solemnity of the judgment that awaits the ecclesia, collectively, urges us to foster a deeper awareness of His ongoing work among us. In conclusion, the promise of Jesus to build His ecclesia is a testament to His unwavering commitment to His followers.

It is a call to recognize that He is not a distant observer but an active participant in the life of the church. As we open our eyes to this reality, we are encouraged to live in the light of His presence, understanding that He walks among us, knowing our works and guiding us in our mission to embody His love and truth in the world.

As we continue to study the Word, particularly the NT, we cannot help but see that the journey of the early ecclesia as depicted in the Acts of the Apostles invites contemporary believers to reflect on their own faith communities. The initial gathering of 120 disciples in an upper room, united in “prayer and supplication” (Acts 1:14), serves as a powerful reminder of the strength found in communal commitment.

This sense of unity, encapsulated in the Greek term “homothumadon,” meaning “one mind” or “same passion,” set the tone for the ecclesia’s development throughout the Acts.

The early believers exemplified a model of unity that is not only a historical account but also a guiding principle for modern ecclesial life. As we explore how the early church operated, we recognize that their reliance on doctrine, fellowship, breaking of bread, and prayer remains pertinent today.

The early ecclesia’s steadfast commitment to four foundational practices, as noted in Acts 2:42, offers insights for contemporary faith communities. The apostles’ doctrine served as the lampstand, illuminating their spiritual path; fellowship fostered a sense of belonging akin to the mercy seat, where grace abounded; the breaking of bread became their table of showbread, symbolizing nourishment and community; and prayers ascended like incense from the altar, connecting them with the divine.

These practices were not mere rituals but essential pillars that defined their identity as the new temple in Christ. The ecclesia was a living testament to the spiritual priesthood, and their actions resonated with the tabernacle’s significance in the wilderness—a reminder that worship and community are intertwined.

As growth marked the journey of the early church, it also brought challenges that tested their unity. The initial explosion of faith in Jerusalem, captured in Acts 2:47, reflects an active Lord adding to the ecclesia daily.

This growth, however, was not without trials. As the number of believers increased, so did the complexities of community life. Conflicts arose, both from within and outside the ecclesia, as illustrated in Acts 6 and 15.

These incidents reveal that growth comes with growing pains, prompting believers to navigate disputes and challenges with wisdom and grace. The early church faced persecution from the Sanhedrin, internal strife, and even doctrinal controversies regarding the law of Moses and the inclusion of Gentile believers.

Each of these moments called for discernment and leadership, showcasing the necessity of working through differences rather than avoiding them. The ecclesia’s response to these internal and external pressures is a reminder for modern believers that conflict can lead to clarity and cohesion when addressed with intentionality.

Paul’s words in 1 Corinthians 11:18-19 emphasize the inevitability of divisions, suggesting that challenges can serve as catalysts for growth and a deeper understanding of faith. The ecclesia’s ability to engage in difficult conversations and find consensus is a testament to their commitment to unity amid diversity.

As they navigated their shared faith, they learned that overcoming challenges together not only strengthened their bonds but also solidified their witness to the world. With that, we see the narrative of the ecclesia in the Acts of the Apostles serves as both a historical account and a roadmap for contemporary Christian communities.

As we reflect on their practices of doctrine, fellowship, breaking of bread, and prayer, we are encouraged to cultivate a spirit of unity that transcends our differences. The early church teaches us that while the journey of faith is marked by challenges, it is also rich with opportunities for growth, healing, and deeper connection to one another and to God.

Just as the Lord added to their number, may our communities continuously strive for unity and purpose, embodying the essence of the ecclesia as we navigate our own journeys of faith.

~Dr. Russell Welch
Elder / Teacher: Highway to Heaven Church and Founder and Shepherd of Remnant Warrior Ministries / Remnant Warrior School of Spiritual Warfare.

If you feel lead to support this ministry you can do so thru this link: Donate

History of the Ecclesia of Jesus Christ, Part One

Posted: November 22, 2024 in disciples life, Kingdom Teaching, Remnant, teaching
Tags: bible, christianity, Ecclesia, faith, God, Jesus, Kingdom living, Kingdom teaching, radical christianity, Spirit led life

Part one of a three part series………

The Ecclesia in the Acts: Understanding Its Meaning and Significance

The term “ecclesia” has long been embraced by Christadelphians as a replacement for the word “church,” and rightly so. “Ecclesia” carries with it a rich tapestry of meaning and significance, rooted in both history and theology.

However, as with any term that becomes commonplace, there is a risk that its vitality may diminish over time. This raises an important question for believers: How do we truly perceive our ecclesia?

Exploring the depth of this term invites us to consider its historical context and its implications for our communal and individual faith experiences. In the New Testament, particularly in Hebrews 12:18-24, the ecclesia is compared to the Israelites at Mount Sinai, a momentous event in biblical history.

The writer starkly contrasts the terrifying experience of the Israelites with their encounter with God—a scene filled with fire, darkness, and fear—with the ecclesia’s arrival at Mount Zion, the city of the living God. Here, the ecclesia is depicted as part of a celestial assembly, a gathering of angels, just men made perfect, and Jesus, the mediator of a new covenant.

This imagery elevates the ecclesia beyond mere physical assembly, positioning it as an ongoing spiritual reality steeped in divine presence and purpose. The historical roots of the term “ecclesia” can be traced back to ancient Greece, particularly around the fourth century BC.

It was in this context that a constitution emerged to formalize the governing assembly of Athens, known as the ecclesia. This assembly was comprised of citizens who convened to deliberate on matters of policy, declare war, elect officials, and administer justice.

The term literally means “the called-out ones,” reflecting a sense of community and responsibility among its members. This democratic assembly emphasized ideals of “freedom and equality,” principles that resonate with the communal aspects of the ecclesia in a spiritual sense.

The relevance of the ecclesia transcends its political connotations, extending into the framework of the early Christian community as depicted in the Acts of the Apostles. When Christ spoke to Peter and the apostles in Matthew 16:18, declaring, “Upon this rock, I will build my ecclesia,” He was not introducing a new concept, but rather recontextualizing a term imbued with collective significance.

The early ecclesia, much like the Greek assembly, was called to convene, support one another, and collectively navigate the challenges of faith in a world rife with opposition.

In the Book of Acts, we see the ecclesia in action, as believers come together in unity, sharing resources, and spreading the gospel. However, it is also evident that the term “ecclesia” was not limited to a mere physical gathering.

The events in Acts 19 illustrate how the word “ecclesia” was used to denote both official assemblies and, at times, chaotic gatherings driven by mob mentality.

The case of Demetrius, who incited a riot against Paul and the believers in Ephesus, serves as a cautionary tale about the potential for distortion in communal settings.

Thus, examining the ecclesia through both its historical and biblical lenses reveals a multifaceted understanding of what it means to be part of this assembly.

It challenges believers to recognize their role as part of a larger spiritual community, one that calls for engagement, mutual support, and a commitment to the teachings of Christ.

As we reflect on our own ecclesia today, we must strive to keep its meaning alive and vibrant. It invites us to ponder how we gather, support one another, and ultimately, how we embody the values and principles established on Sinai and exemplified in the Acts of the Apostles.

By embracing the fullness of the ecclesia, we ensure that it remains a dynamic force for spiritual growth, unity, and service in a world that often seeks to divide. In doing so, we honor its profound legacy and reaffirm our commitment to being the “called-out ones” in every aspect of our lives.

The term “ecclesia,” with its richness in historical and cultural significance, serves as a bridge between the Judaic roots of early Christianity and its evolution into a distinct faith.

With its origins in the Septuagint (LXX), the Greek translation of the Hebrew Bible, ecclesia encapsulates the essence of a gathered community—a concept that resonated deeply with both Jews and early Christians. As we explore its implications, we uncover how this term shaped the understanding of community, authority, and divine purpose in the formative years of the Christian faith.

The Septuagint was created in the 3rd century BC by Jewish scholars in Alexandria, Egypt, who sought to make their sacred texts accessible to a Greek-speaking audience. In this translation, ecclesia appears as a noun seventy-seven times, establishing its foundational role in the relationship between God and His people.

Notably, it was in the context of divine assembly that the term first emerged, as documented in Deuteronomy 4:10, where Moses addresses the Israelites at Mount Sinai, urging them to remember the day of the assembly (ecclesia).

This moment was not merely a historical event; it signified the establishment of a covenant community called to hear God’s words and pass them on to future generations, thereby reinforcing the importance of collective worship and obedience.

Jesus’s use of the word “ecclesia” in Matthew 16:18, where He declares, “upon this rock I will build my ecclesia,” is particularly poignant. His choice of terminology indicates a deliberate connection to the rich history of the term as found in the Septuagint.

By employing ecclesia, Jesus indicated the creation of a new community—the body of believers—rooted in the same principles that defined the assembly of Israel.

The Apostles, familiar with the LXX, understood the weight of this word choice and its implications for their mission. They viewed the ecclesia as a continuation of God’s covenant with His people, tasked with embodying His teachings and spreading the message of salvation.

The comparative study of ecclesia and its Hebrew equivalent, “qahal,” further elucidates its significance. While both terms imply a gathering of people, “qahal” emphasizes the act of being called together by God.

This divine summoning establishes a deeper relationship between the community and their Creator, reflecting a commitment to live in accordance with His will. Barclay’s observation highlights this distinction, noting that ecclesia is not just a congregation that happens to come together; it is a body of people called into action by God.

This understanding is crucial for grasping the nature of the early Christian community, which saw itself as divinely commissioned to fulfill God’s mission on Earth.

Moreover, the early church’s identity was distinct from that of the synagogue, which had become a community space for Jewish worship separate from the temple. While synagogues served an essential role in the Jewish faith, they lacked the transformative purpose that Jesus attributed to His ecclesia.

By establishing a new community, Jesus redefined the concept of worship and fellowship, moving beyond the physical confines of the synagogue to create a spiritual temple made up of believers—an idea echoed in 1 Peter 2:5, where Christians are described as “living stones” being built into a spiritual house.

Thus, we see that the term ecclesia as found in the Septuagint serves as a critical link connecting the Jewish heritage of early Christians to the foundation of their faith.

By understanding its historical context and significance, we can appreciate the profound implications of Jesus’s declaration to build His ecclesia. The early church, rooted in the traditions of Israel, embraced its role as a living embodiment of God’s purpose on Earth, fostering a community designed not only for worship but also for action and outreach.

As we reflect on the rich history of ecclesia, we recognize the enduring call for believers to gather, listen, and respond to God’s voice, thereby continuing the legacy of faith that began millennia ago.

~Dr. Russell Welch
Elder / Teacher: Highway to Heaven Church and Founder and Shepherd of Remnant Warrior Ministries / Remnant Warrior School of Spiritual Warfare.

The Rapture: Bible Truth or Christian Error Part Two

Posted: November 21, 2024 in Kingdom Teaching, Remnant, Spirit-Wind People, teaching
Tags: bible, christianity, False Rapture Doctrine, God, Jesus, Kingdom living, Kingdom teaching, radical christianity, rapture, Spirit led life, The Rapture Doctrine

Jesus on “Rapture”:

Understanding Context and Meaning** The concept of the “rapture” has been a topic of considerable debate within Christian circles, particularly when examining scriptural references such as 1 Thessalonians 4. Many believers look to Jesus’ teachings in the Olivet Discourse—found in Mark 13, Luke 21, and Matthew 24—as a basis for their understanding of this event.

However, a careful analysis reveals that this interpretation is a departure from the historical and cultural context in which Jesus spoke. Living in the first century, during the height of Roman dominance, Jesus encountered a world rife with turmoil and political oppression. Many Jews, especially those with zealous expectations of a messiah, anticipated a savior who would overthrow Roman rule and establish an earthly kingdom.

In stark contrast to these expectations, Jesus advocated for a radical message of love and forgiveness, urging his followers to “love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you” (Matthew 5).

This subversive teaching was revolutionary, challenging the prevailing notion of a militaristic messiah and calling for a different kind of engagement with adversaries—one marked by compassion rather than violence. Jesus’ instruction to “put away your sword” served as a profound rebuke to the desire for a warrior king, illustrating that his mission was not to incite rebellion or violence against Rome, but rather to transform hearts.

In this context, it becomes evident that Jesus did not preach an impending escape from earthly woes, but instead sought to address the immediate struggles of his followers and the larger socio-political landscape. The idea of the “rapture”—a sudden removal of believers from the world—was not a concept rooted in his teachings or the understanding of his contemporaries.

Moreover, the apocalyptic language in Mark 13 should not be misconstrued as a prophetic roadmap for a future rapture. Jesus spoke directly to the realities facing his audience, prophesying the destruction of the Temple in 70 CE—a monumental event that fulfilled his warnings about the consequences of unfaithfulness within Israel.

The phrase “this generation” (Mark 13:30) indicates that Jesus’ prophecies were directed toward those who were alive at that time, not a distant future event. The signs he described—wars, persecution, and cosmic upheaval—were all part of the historical context surrounding the impending collapse of Jerusalem, not signs of an eschatological rapture.

The parallel between Jesus’ warnings and the subsequent events of the Jewish War serves to ground his message in reality. The false messiahs, wars, famine, and natural disasters he foretold were not mere symbols but tangible occurrences that would affect the people of his time.

By understanding these prophecies as reflections of the sociopolitical climate of first-century Judea, we gain a clearer perspective on Jesus’ teachings and their implications. Additionally, the emotive language used by Jesus, which included cosmic imagery, was a rhetorical device rooted in Jewish prophetic tradition.

Such language was not to be taken literally but served to convey the catastrophic impact of political upheaval. Just as contemporary language can describe events in hyperbolic terms—such as calling 9/11 an “earth-shattering event” without implying a literal earthquake—Jesus employed similar expressions to communicate the magnitude of the coming changes.

In conclusion, while belief in a future second coming remains integral to Christian theology, associating Jesus’ teachings in the Olivet Discourse with the modern concept of the rapture misinterprets his message and the historical context in which it was given.

Jesus did not offer a vision of escape; rather, he called his followers to engage with the world through love, compassion, and resilience in the face of adversity. Understanding this distinction enriches our comprehension of his teachings and reinforces the call to address the pressing issues of our time, rather than retreating into a desire for an escape from reality.

Jesus Wept Over His Prediction of Destruction: A Reflection on Hope and Resurrection The image of Jesus weeping over Jerusalem serves as a profound testament to the tension between divine prophecy and human compassion.

This poignant moment, marked by grief and foresight, encapsulates the essence of Christ’s mission on earth. As he gazes upon the city, Jesus is acutely aware of the destructive path that the people have chosen, driven by zeal and misunderstanding.

His tears are not merely for the physical destruction looming on the horizon but resonate with a deeper sorrow for the spiritual blindness that leads to such ruin. This act of lament reveals a heart that longs for redemption and restoration instead of annihilation, inviting us to reflect on the broader implications of his tears.

In the context of Jesus’s lament, it is essential to recognize the significance of the Temple’s destruction. For the Jewish people, the Temple represented the very dwelling place of God, a sacred space that facilitated their relationship with the divine.

However, Jesus’s prediction of its demise marks a pivotal moment in the divine narrative, symbolizing the transition from a physical locus of God’s presence to a new spiritual reality embodied in Christ himself. By referring to himself as the “Son of Man,” an allusion to the prophetic vision found in Daniel 7, Jesus positions himself at the intersection of suffering and vindication, revealing the duality of his identity as both the suffering servant and the glorious Messiah.

The implications of this transition are immense. The destruction of the Temple signifies the end of an era, laying the groundwork for the establishment of a new covenant that transcends geographical and cultural boundaries.

In this new paradigm, Jesus becomes the ultimate Temple, inviting believers into a direct and personal relationship with God. This transformation is not merely prophetic; it serves as a declaration of hope amidst despair. While Jesus weeps for what will be lost, he simultaneously embodies the prophetic truth of resurrection and renewal that is to follow.

The message of hope embedded in Jesus’s lament is echoed in the writings of Paul, particularly in Romans 8, where liberation from decay and the restoration of the world are intimately connected to the resurrection of believers.

Contrary to popular eschatological narratives that emphasize fear and withdrawal, the biblical story exhorts us to engage with the present moment and work toward the transformation of our world. The historical context of the Roman siege of Jerusalem in 70 CE serves as a reminder that tribulation is not to be escaped but confronted with resilience and hope.

Furthermore, the imagery presented in the Book of Revelation underscores this theme of renewal. The culmination of God’s redemptive plan is characterized by the wiping away of tears and the eradication of death and pain.

Rather than envisioning a future that invites us to escape worldly struggles, this vision calls believers to embrace the transformative work of God, actively participating in the renewal of creation. The contrast between the desire for a rapture—a yearning to flee from earthly difficulties—and Jesus’s mission to incarnate hope amidst struggle could not be starker.

His call is to embrace the world and reflect the future glory of God’s kingdom in our present lives. In conclusion, the profound emotional response of Jesus toward Jerusalem invites us to reevaluate our understanding of eschatology.

Our focus should shift from anticipating a distant, chaotic end to embracing a narrative steeped in resurrection and restoration. The hope embedded in Jesus’s teachings and the overarching New Testament message paints a picture of a renewed world where justice flourishes and life abounds.

As we navigate the complexities of our challenges, we must remember that our future is not one of abandonment but divine fulfillment—an invitation to reflect this truth in our current actions and attitudes.

Therefore, like Jesus, we, too, can weep for the brokenness of our world while remaining steadfast in our hope for renewal that lies ahead. Our tears can become seeds of hope, inspiring us to work towards a transformed future defined by love, justice, and grace.

Fellow students of the Word, as we navigate the complexities of theological beliefs, it is essential to return to the foundational teachings of Scripture and reevaluate our understanding of key concepts like the rapture in light of the Apostle Paul’s timeless message.

In the end we find that the doctrine of the Rapture, when examined through a critical lens, reveals itself to be both unbiblical and illogical. The lack of scriptural foundation, coupled with internal contradictions, suggests that this doctrine may not merely be an alternative interpretation but rather a belief that should be rejected.

Whether viewed through the lens of biblical integrity or logical consistency, the Rapture raises profound questions that challenge its acceptance within Christian doctrine. As believers, it is essential to engage in thoughtful discourse and discernment, seeking clarity on theological matters that shape our understanding of faith and salvation.

Ultimately, the examination of the Rapture presents an opportunity for deeper reflection on the nature of God’s promises and the true meaning of Christ’s return.

~Dr. Russell Welch
Elder / Teacher: Highway to Heaven Church and Founder and Shepherd of Remnant Warrior Ministries / Remnant Warrior School of Spiritual Warfare.

The Rapture: Bible Truth or Christian Error Part One

Posted: November 20, 2024 in Kingdom Teaching, Remnant, teaching
Tags: bible, christianity, Error in the Church, Escapism theology, God, Jesus, Kingdom living, Kingdom teaching, rapture, Spirit led life, The False Rapture Doctrine

The doctrine of the Rapture, a widely debated topic within Christian eschatology, raises profound questions regarding its scriptural basis and logical coherence. After engaging in discussions about the Rapture, it becomes apparent that there are significant issues surrounding its interpretation.

Over the next two days I will lay out the argument that I have used in several debates (which I was considered the winner) that aims to explore whether the Rapture is simply an error of interpretation, a matter of differing viewpoints, or a doctrine that should be firmly rejected. Through a critical analysis, it becomes evident that the Rapture is not only unbiblical but also illogical, prompting a reevaluation of its legitimacy in the context of Christian belief.

First and foremost, the argument that the Rapture is unbiblical is compelling. A fundamental issue is the absence of any explicit mention of a distinct Rapture event in the Scriptures, separate from the Second Coming of Jesus Christ. Proponents of the doctrine often dissect various biblical passages, claiming that some refer to the Rapture while others pertain to the Second Coming.

Yet, this division is made without clear scriptural justification. The assumption that there exists a Rapture necessitates a prior belief in its existence, which leads to a circular interpretation of Scripture. To accept the Rapture, one must first impose the concept onto the biblical text rather than deriving it from a straightforward reading of scripture itself.

This poses a fundamental challenge to its validity as a doctrine grounded in scriptural truth. Moreover, the illogical nature of the Rapture doctrine further undermines its credibility. The doctrine presents a series of contradictions that defy rational thought.

For instance, proponents claim that the Rapture is the coming of Christ yet argue that it is not the Second Coming. This paradox begs the question: how can an event that is described as a coming of Christ not be acknowledged as His return?

Such semantic gymnastics create confusion and render the doctrine incoherent. Additionally, the assertion that the Rapture occurs on the “Last Day,” while simultaneously suggesting it can happen years prior, raises further questions regarding its consistency.

If the Rapture is indeed the resurrection of believers, it cannot logically occur before the Last Day, as Scripture explicitly states that resurrection takes place then. This inconsistency highlights a fundamental flaw in the doctrine’s framework.

Furthermore, the implications of the Rapture doctrine raise significant theological concerns. If believers are to be taken up in a Rapture before the end of the world, what becomes of Christ’s promises regarding eternal life and resurrection on the Last Day?

The biblical promise that those who believe in Him will be raised on the Last Day appears to contradict the Rapture narrative. This contradiction not only challenges the reliability of Jesus’ words but also calls into question whether the doctrine diminishes the integrity of the biblical message.

If Christ’s promises are rendered obsolete for those who come to faith after the supposed Rapture, the doctrine potentially transforms the nature of salvation and the promises of God.

But again, lets take a closer look at one of the key passage the escapist like to stand on which is 1 Thessalonians 4:15-17, where the Apostle Paul addresses the concerns of the Christian community in Thessalonica regarding the fate of those who have died before Christ’s return.

However, upon closer examination, it becomes apparent that Paul’s intent was not to outline an escapist theology but to articulate a hope grounded in bodily resurrection and the ultimate reunion of believers at Christ’s return to earth. For a brief moment, let us dive into the nuances of Paul’s language, the Greek terminology he employed, and the broader implications of his teachings, ultimately arguing that the rapture, as commonly understood, is a misinterpretation of the biblical text.

To grasp Paul’s message in 1 Thessalonians, it is essential to recognize the context in which he wrote. The Thessalonian church was grappling with questions surrounding death and the second coming of Christ.

Paul reassures them that those who have died—referred to metaphorically as “fallen asleep”—are not lost or forsaken but will be resurrected at the Lord’s coming. He emphasizes a shared destiny for both the living and the deceased, portraying the return of Christ as a joyous event marked by a physical resurrection, rather than a sudden evacuation from the earth.

The phrase “caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air” has often been interpreted as a promise of escaping earthly existence. However, when viewed in the larger context of Pauline theology, particularly in tandem with his writings in 1 Corinthians 15 and Romans 8, it becomes evident that the emphasis is not on leaving the earth but on the transformation and glorification of believers at Christ’s return.

One focal point of this analysis is the interpretation of the Greek term “ἀήρ” (air), which Paul uses in this passage. Many contemporary interpretations associate this term with “sky,” suggesting a heavenly ascent. However, a closer examination reveals that “ἀήρ” refers specifically to the lower and denser atmosphere.

This distinction is critical; it indicates that Paul was not advocating for a departure into the upper realms of heaven but rather a transformative encounter in the earthly atmosphere.

Contrastingly, the Greek term for heaven, “οὐρανός,” connotes a higher, transcendent space. By choosing “ἀήρ” over “οὐρανός,” Paul highlights a connection to the earthly realm, reinforcing the notion that the ultimate goal is not escape but resurrection and reuniting with Christ, who is returning to earth.

Furthermore, the mixed metaphors present in Paul’s language complicate the rapture narrative. The imagery of being “caught up” is not indicative of a one-time event but rather a communal experience that celebrates the fulfillment of God’s promise of resurrection.

Paul’s use of metaphoric language reflects his intent to convey hope and assurance rather than a detailed blueprint of end-time events. It is vital to acknowledge that Paul, like Jesus, did not envision a distant future characterized by a Great Tribulation or a need for believers to be evacuated from the planet. Instead, both figures shared a vision of God’s kingdom coming to fruition on earth, culminating in a physical resurrection that included all believers.

Thus we find that the belief in the rapture, as popularly understood, seems to diverge significantly from the teachings of Paul and the intentions of the biblical text.

By analyzing the linguistic choices and the broader context of 1 Thessalonians, it becomes clear that Paul’s message centers on resurrection, hope, and the ultimate fulfillment of God’s promises in the physical realm.

Rather than an escape to the heavens, Paul offers a vision of restoration and reunion that invites believers to embrace their earthly existence while looking forward to a transformative encounter with Christ.

But let us continue in the realm of biblical interpretation, Paul’s use of mixed metaphors serves as a powerful tool for conveying profound theological concepts. His connections to the Old Testament, particularly through the figures of Moses and the imagery from Daniel, illuminate his understanding of God’s relationship with humanity and the nature of Christ’s return.

By examining these metaphors, we can grasp the depth of Paul’s message and its implications for the early Christian community, particularly in the face of persecution.

The first metaphor Paul employs is that of Moses descending from Mount Sinai with the Law, heralded by the blast of a trumpet. This powerful image evokes the moment when God descended to meet Moses, establishing a divine-human connection that highlights God’s initiative to engage with humanity.

In this context, God’s trajectory is downward, symbolizing His willingness to come to us, rather than demanding that we ascend to Him. This downward motion invites reflection on the nature of divine authority and the responsibilities of those who receive God’s revelation.

Moses’s ascent to the mountaintop signifies a moment of divine encounter, yet it is the act of coming down that emphasizes the importance of service and accessibility. Paul’s metaphor encourages believers to embody this same movement—leaving behind the heights of spiritual privilege to serve and uplift those who are “below.”

The second image Paul draws upon originates from the Book of Daniel, where the “one like the son of man” represents the vindication of God’s people over their adversaries. Here, clouds symbolize divine authority and judgment, reinforcing the idea that God’s intervention is both powerful and redemptive.

In applying this metaphor to the early Christian community, Paul reassures believers facing persecution that their suffering is not in vain. Rather, it is a part of a larger narrative in which God will ultimately rescue and restore His people.

This theme resonates deeply with those who find themselves marginalized or oppressed, offering hope in the promise of vindication and divine justice.

Moreover, Paul introduces a third image that transcends the biblical narrative—an emperor visiting a city, welcomed by a jubilant procession.

This metaphor captures the anticipation of Christ’s return and the role of the church as an active participant in ushering in the Kingdom of God. The imagery of a royal procession implies a sense of communal expectation and celebration, inviting believers to envision themselves as heralds of a new creation.

Again, contrary to popular interpretations of the “rapture,” Paul’s portrayal emphasizes a collective, rather than individualistic, experience of Christ’s return. This understanding aligns with his broader theological framework, where resurrection and restoration take precedence over mere escape from earthly trials.

Ultimately, Paul’s mixed metaphors paint a rich tapestry of hope and purpose for the Christian community. Through these images, he articulates a vision of God’s kingdom that transcends the temporal and physical confines of our world.

Rather than promoting a theology centered on escaping the earth, Paul envisions a future where heaven and earth unite in harmony, establishing a perpetual, divine reign on this planet. This eschatological view emphasizes resurrection, healing, and the establishment of God’s eternal kingdom, fostering a sense of belonging and mission within the community of believers.

In exploring Paul’s metaphors, we are reminded that he is not the sole voice in this conversation—Jesus’ teachings and actions also warrant consideration. As we engage with the broader narrative of scripture, we can deepen our understanding of the profound implications of Christ’s return and what it means for our lives today.

Through this exploration, we are called not only to anticipate the future but to actively participate in the unfolding of God’s kingdom in the here and now, embodying the love and grace that reflect the heart of the divine.

In the part two of this thread, we will dive into the scriptures and look at what Jesus taught or didn’t teach about the rapture.

~Dr. Russell Welch
Elder / Teacher: Highway to Heaven Church and Founder and Shepherd of Remnant Warrior Ministries / Remnant Warrior School of Spiritual Warfare.

The Call to Action: Rallying for Repentance and Restoration

Posted: November 20, 2024 in disciples life, Kingdom Teaching, Prophetic, Remnant, Spiritual warfare
Tags: bible, Bride of Christ, christianity, faith, God, Jesus, Kingdom living, Kingdom teaching, radical disciples, Spirit led life

In the bustling heart of every city, there lies a yearning for restoration, a collective cry for divine intervention. The call to pray and blow the shofar resonates deeply within us, echoing the ancient words of the prophet Joel: “Blow the trumpet in Zion; sound the alarm on my holy hill.”

As we turn our hearts toward Jehovah, the God of all creation, we embark on a sacred mission to seek repentance for the sins that plague our communities. This is not merely a physical act; it is a spiritual awakening, a rallying cry for those who desire to reclaim their cities, their states, and ultimately, their nation.

Scripture reminds us in Joel 2:1-16 that we have been entrusted with the duty of watchmen, standing vigilant on the walls of Jerusalem. We must never rest until the Lord establishes His presence among us, transforming our cities into beacons of hope and praise.

Nehemiah 4:20 further emphasizes that when the shofar sounds, we are to rally together, confident that our God will fight for us. This is the essence of our mission: to unite as a faithful Remnant, armed with the knowledge that divine strength empowers our efforts.

As the Holy Spirit sweeps across our nation, from town to town and city to city, there is a profound invitation extended to us all. The Father seeks a people who are willing to humble themselves, surrendering their lives to His Lordship. He calls for those branded by the cross, desiring nothing more than to be known as faithful servants.

This is the Remnant He seeks to gather, equip, and send forth, like a mighty army reclaiming the gates of our cities. With hearts ignited by the fire of holiness, we shed the garments of this world, donning the robes of righteousness offered by the Father.

The vision of the Ecclesia—the gathered body of believers—emerges as a powerful force throughout the nation. From these gatherings, we hear the echoes of Heaven: “Holy, holy, holy is the Lord God Almighty, who was, and is, and is to come.” It is a call that transcends individual aspirations and beckons us to participate in the greater narrative of divine restoration.

The question looms large: Are we willing to answer this call? Are we prepared to lay down our personal dreams for the greater dream that the Father has envisioned for each of us since the dawn of time?

To answer this call is to embrace a journey of transformation. It requires the courage to confront our idols—those distractions and barriers that hinder our relationship with the Lord. It invites us into the fire of the Holy Spirit, purifying our hearts and refining our purpose.

The hour of gathering has arrived; the Lord of the Harvest stands ready to send His workers into the ripened fields. The question remains: Is that you? Are you willing to partake in this movement of repentance and restoration, to be a vessel for change in your community and beyond?

Now is the time for action. As we pray and blow the shofar for our cities, let us do so with fervent hearts, trusting that God will hear our cries and respond with His grace and power.

Let us unite as watchmen, laborers, and faithful servants, committed to the mission of bringing about a revival that spans our nation. Together, we can create a future where our cities reflect the glory of God, a future where we walk in righteousness and declare His praises boldly.

The moment has come to stand together and answer the call—will you join us in this sacred endeavor?

~Dr. Russell Welch
Elder / Teacher: Highway to Heaven Church and Founder and Shepherd of Remnant Warrior Ministries / Remnant Warrior School of Spiritual Warfare.

If you live in the North Florida Region and this message speaks to you, lets connect and share visions.

Email: dr.russwelch@remnantwarrior.org

An Ecclesia devoid of Christ’s leadership is not “Kingdom”.

Posted: November 14, 2024 in Kingdom Teaching, Remnant, teaching
Tags: bible, Bride of Christ, christianity, church, Ecclesia, faith, Jesus, Kingdom, Spirit led life

The concept of ecclesia, often translated as “church,” holds profound significance within its original context, intricately tied to the notion of the Kingdom of God. To fully grasp the authentic meaning of ecclesia, one must acknowledge its relationship with the Kingdom.

When ecclesia is divorced from this context, it risks becoming a mere construct, shaped by human interpretation and desires, rather than a true reflection of its divine intent. In such a scenario, the church can be molded into any form that suits our preferences, effectively sidelining the authority and guidance of Jesus, the King.

Dismissing the Kingdom in our understanding of ecclesia leads us down a perilous path where the essence of the church is distorted. It implies a presumption that we, rather than Christ, can dictate the parameters of what church should be. This attitude not only undermines the foundation of the Kingdom but also negates the promise of Christ’s abiding presence: “Lo, I am with you always, to the end of the age.”

By ignoring this commitment, we arrogantly suggest that the church can operate independently, free from Holy Spirit oversight. The implications of such a mindset extend beyond semantics; they strike at the very heart of our collective identity as the Body of Christ.

When the church is left to decide its own identity and purpose without the Kingdom context, we risk creating a situation where personal or collective whims dictate doctrine and practice. This approach is antithetical to the foundational principles of Christianity and can be deemed as false.

This reality is evident not only in discussions about ecclesia but also in interpretations surrounding apostles, prophets, and the teachings of Scripture. Moreover, echoing the sentiments of the Reformation, the current state of ecclesia devoid of Kingdom authority could lead us back to a form of spiritual darkness reminiscent of the Dark Ages.

It represents a departure from the authority of Scripture and an embrace of a man-made system—a trend that surfaced during the Reformation as a reaction against ecclesiastical corruption. We find ourselves at a crucial juncture where a spiritual reset is not just desirable, but necessary. The call for a Revolutionary Holy Spirit led Reformation is imperative; we must allow Holy Spirit to guide us toward a renewed understanding of the Kingdom and its intended expression through ecclesia.

As we take a step back we can clearly that the ecclesia’s true meaning is intimately linked to the Kingdom of God. To recognize this relationship is to honor the original intent of Jesus and to embrace a church that reflects His authority and purpose.

The journey toward this understanding requires humility and a willingness to step back, allowing Holy Spirit to breathe fresh life into our concept of church, ensuring it aligns with the divine blueprint established by the King. It is only through this alignment that we can hope to fulfill our calling as the authentic Body of Christ in the world today.

~Dr. Russell Welch
Lead Elder and Apostolic Teacher: Highway to Heaven Church and Founder and Shepherd of Remnant Warrior Ministries / Remnant Warrior School of Spiritual Warfare.

“The True Meaning of “Apostolic” in Contemporary Christianity”

Posted: November 11, 2024 in disciples life, Kingdom Teaching, Prophetic, Remnant, teaching
Tags: bible, christianity, faith, God, Jesus, kingdom growth, Kingdom living, Kingdom teaching, radical disciples, Spirit led life

While driving the other day I felt Holy Spirit speaking to my spirit about the spiritual battles that are being waged in the Supernatural Reset that is taking place in the Heavenlies and on Earth, for the destinies of nations and especially for the reformation of the Lord’s Ecclesia.

In that conversation I believe I heard Him sharing a word that He was re-birthing a restoration to the Apostolic, liberating it from the restrictive confines of religion. I have had several conversations with seasoned warriors of the faith about this and feel led to write about it.

Now, over the years in my walk with Holy Spirit, I have found that He often speaks to me by showing me dreams, visions, pictures, and images as visual confirmations, and right as I heard Him making the statement about the Apostolic I looked up and saw in the sky, and immediately took a photo, which is in the banner below.

So here it goes……….

In today’s society, where religious language often seems diluted and commercialized, the term “Apostolic” has become a buzzword that many use to lend legitimacy to their ministries or personal identities. However, this trend has precipitated a crisis of understanding regarding the authentic meaning of the term.

Once grounded in the teachings and authority of the Apostles, the word “Apostolic” now risks being reduced to a mere Christian catchphrase, devoid of its powerful theological implications. To navigate this confusion, we must return to the scriptural roots and examine what it truly means to identify with the Apostolic.

At its core, being Apostolic signifies a commitment to uphold the orthodoxy of the Apostles’ teachings—a Christ-centric doctrine that emphasizes the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus as central to the Christian faith. In a world increasingly characterized by self-promotion and elitism, this return to foundational teachings is essential.

The tendency for individuals and ministries to label themselves as “Apostolic” often stems from a desire to assert themselves as God’s chosen representatives, creating an exclusive club that undermines the universal nature of the Gospel. However, Scripture reminds us that God has hidden His Remnant within every culture and community—those who genuinely bow to Him and adhere to His truth.

The proliferation of Christian platitudes—trite phrases and hollow expressions—has become commonplace, akin to free drinks at a cheap wedding, readily available but lacking substance. Yet, in this critical hour, the Holy Spirit is actively revealing the authentic from the fraudulent. The current spiritual climate is akin to a divine reset, where truth is being separated from deception, and the Church is being called to a deeper understanding of its purpose and identity.

The global Church, often perceived as divided and weak, is, in fact, witnessing the separation of wheat from tares, a fulfillment of biblical prophecy that we are indeed the generation destined to witness the emergence of the sons and daughters of God. However, this journey toward authenticity is not without challenges. Hell is also at work, attempting to stall the profound movements God has ordained for this time.

The enemy’s patterns of deception are increasingly sophisticated, aiming to mislead believers and stifle the Church’s destiny. Yet, as God assured Elijah during times of uncertainty, He has reserved thousands who remain faithful to Him. This assurance is pivotal as we navigate a world filled with competing ideologies and diluted truths.

The Lord’s authentic Ecclesia—His true body of believers—will prevail. The Remnant, those who cling to the teachings of the Apostles and engage in a genuine relationship with Christ, will break forth in victory.

As we embrace our identity as part of this Remnant, we must resist the temptation to merely adopt labels for the sake of recognition. Instead, we should pursue an understanding of what it means to be truly Apostolic, rooted in the orthodoxy of faith and a commitment to live out the teachings of Christ.

So, in understanding that while “Apostolic” may be a term that has been co-opted in contemporary Christian discourse, it still holds profound significance. It calls us back to the core teachings of the Apostles and challenges us to examine our motives and actions as we navigate our faith journeys.

As we strive to embody the authentic spirit of the Apostolic, we can participate in the divine narrative that God is weaving through history, confident that His Remnant will rise and prevail against the forces of darkness.

The true meaning of being Apostolic is not about elitism or status, but about faithful adherence to the truth of the Gospel and the transformative power it holds for our lives and communities.

Yes, we can see where the term “Apostolic” often conjures images of elitism, exclusivity, and a sense of higher status among those who claim the title. However, the essence of being Apostolic is far more profound and inclusive. It is not merely a badge of honor but a commitment to faithfully adhere to the teachings of the Gospel and an acknowledgment of the transformative power it holds not only for individual lives but also for communities as a whole.

Understanding this true meaning is essential for fostering genuine faith and connection in a diverse society. At its core, being Apostolic means following the teachings and practices established by the apostles—those early followers of Christ who carried His message to the world. The apostles exemplified a life of humility, service, and unwavering dedication to their faith, often facing persecution and hardship for the sake of spreading the Gospel.

Their legacy serves as a reminder that the call to be Apostolic is not about personal glory or social standing; it is about embodying the principles of love, grace, and sacrifice that Christ demonstrated during His life. Faithful adherence to the truth of the Gospel is a vital aspect of being Apostolic.

The Gospel, which translates to “good news,” offers a message of hope, redemption, and reconciliation with God. It presents a narrative of love that transcends boundaries and invites all individuals into a relationship with the Creator. By embracing this truth, Apostolic individuals commit themselves to a way of living that reflects the teachings of Christ, fostering an environment where love and understanding flourish. This adherence is not a rigid set of rules but a dynamic relationship with God that transforms both the individual and the community.

The transformative power of the Gospel cannot be overstated. It has the capacity to change hearts, heal wounds, and bring people together across divides. When individuals experience the love and grace inherent in the Gospel, they are empowered to extend that same love and grace to others. This creates a ripple effect, transforming communities and fostering unity among diverse groups of people.

The true Apostolic spirit encourages believers to act as agents of change, advocating for justice, compassion, and understanding in a world that often prioritizes division and discord. Moreover, the Apostolic calling challenges believers to look beyond themselves and their immediate circles. It encourages outreach to those who are marginalized, oppressed, or searching for hope.

Being Apostolic means actively engaging in the struggles of others, standing in solidarity with those who suffer, and working tirelessly toward the common good. It is an invitation to be part of a larger narrative—one that seeks to bring the Gospel’s transformative message to every corner of society.

This, with a better understanding that the true meaning of being Apostolic is not grounded in elitism or status but rather in a faithful adherence to the truth of the Gospel. It invites individuals to embrace the transformative power of Christ’s message and to live it out in their daily lives. By doing so, they become instruments of change, fostering love, unity, and hope in their communities.

As we strive to embody this Apostolic spirit, we open ourselves to the profound impact of the Gospel, not only on our lives but also on the world around us. In this pursuit, we find not just our true identity as believers but also a shared mission that transcends boundaries and brings us closer to the heart of God.

~Dr. Russell Welch
Lead Elder and Apostolic Teacher: Highway to Heaven Church and Founder and Shepherd of Remnant Warrior Ministries / Remnant Warrior School of Spiritual Warfare.

Radical Disciples – A Remnant Revolution

Latest Posts

Categories

Posts Tagged ‘Jesus’

The Rise of the Franchise Church Model: A Reflection on 1 Corinthians 3:11

The unveiling of the Rapid Response Remnant Warrior Regiments

The Rapture: Bible Truth or Christian Error Part Three

History of the Ecclesia of Jesus Christ, Part Two

History of the Ecclesia of Jesus Christ, Part One

The Rapture: Bible Truth or Christian Error Part Two

The Rapture: Bible Truth or Christian Error Part One

The Call to Action: Rallying for Repentance and Restoration

An Ecclesia devoid of Christ’s leadership is not “Kingdom”.

“The True Meaning of “Apostolic” in Contemporary Christianity”